Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Sep 28, 2020
Date Accepted: Jan 25, 2021

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Acceptance and Use of Home-Based Electronic Symptom Self-Reporting Systems in Patients With Cancer: Systematic Review

Cho Y, Zhang H, Harris MR, Gong Y, Smith EL, Jiang Y

Acceptance and Use of Home-Based Electronic Symptom Self-Reporting Systems in Patients With Cancer: Systematic Review

J Med Internet Res 2021;23(3):e24638

DOI: 10.2196/24638

PMID: 33709929

PMCID: 7998328

Acceptance and Use of Home-Based Electronic Symptom Self-Reporting Systems (e-SRS) in Patients with Cancer: Systematic Review

  • Youmin Cho; 
  • Huiting Zhang; 
  • Marcelline Ruth Harris; 
  • Yang Gong; 
  • Ellen Lavoie Smith; 
  • Yun Jiang

ABSTRACT

Background:

Electronic symptom self-reporting systems (e-SRS) have demonstrated benefits to improve symptoms and survival in patients with cancer. However, patient engagement in using e-SRS for voluntary symptom self-reporting is less optimal. Multiple factors can potentially affect patients’ acceptance and engagement in using home-based e-SRS. While such factors have not been fully explored among cancer populations.

Objective:

This review aimed to understand cancer patients’ acceptance and use of home-based e-SRS and identify associated facilitators/barriers.

Methods:

PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, and PsycINFO (January 2010 - March 2020) were searched using a combination of MeSH terms and keywords: symptom self-reporting, electronic/technology, cancer, and their synonyms. Included studies focused on the use of home-based e-SRS by patients with cancer and their families. Studies of patients’ use of e-SRS in clinical settings only were excluded. Factors associated with patient acceptance and use of e-SRS were extracted and synthesized.

Results:

Of 3740 articles retrieved, 33 remained for the final review. Most e-SRS were web-based (66%) or mobile app-based (27%). The e-SRS initial acceptance, represented by patient enrollment rates, ranged from 40 to 100%. High e-SRS acceptance was rated by 69-80% of patients after they used the system. The e-SRS use, measured by patient response rates to questionnaires (ranged from 45% to 92%) or system log-on rates (ranged from 33% to 99%), declined over time in general patterns. Few studies (n=7) reported e-SRS use beyond 6 months, with the response rates from 62-85.1% and the log-on rates from 63.6-77%. The availability of compatible devices and technical support, interactive system features, information accessibility, and privacy, questionnaire quality, patient physical/psychosocial status, and age were associated with patient acceptance and the use of home-based e-SRS.

Conclusions:

Cancer patients’ acceptance and use of home-based e-SRS varied significantly across studies, assessed by a variety of approaches. The lack of access to technology remained as a significant barrier to e-SRS adoption. Interactive system features and personalized questionnaires may increase patient engagement. More studies are needed to further understand patients’ long-term use of home-based e-SRS behavior patterns, in order to develop personalized interventions to support cancer patients’ symptom self-management and self-reporting for optimal health outcomes.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Cho Y, Zhang H, Harris MR, Gong Y, Smith EL, Jiang Y

Acceptance and Use of Home-Based Electronic Symptom Self-Reporting Systems in Patients With Cancer: Systematic Review

J Med Internet Res 2021;23(3):e24638

DOI: 10.2196/24638

PMID: 33709929

PMCID: 7998328

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.