Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Sep 25, 2020
Date Accepted: Dec 12, 2020
Date Submitted to PubMed: Apr 15, 2021

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Socioeconomic Disparities in eHealth Literacy and Preventive Behaviors During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Hong Kong: Cross-sectional Study

Guo Z, Zhao S, Guo N, Wu Y, Weng X, Wong JYH, Lam TH, Wang MP

Socioeconomic Disparities in eHealth Literacy and Preventive Behaviors During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Hong Kong: Cross-sectional Study

J Med Internet Res 2021;23(4):e24577

DOI: 10.2196/24577

PMID: 33784240

PMCID: 8048711

Socioeconomic Disparities in eHealth Literacy and Preventive Behaviors during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Hong Kong: Cross-Sectional Study

  • Ziqiu Guo; 
  • Shengzhi Zhao; 
  • Ningyuan Guo; 
  • Yongda Wu; 
  • Xue Weng; 
  • Janet Yuen-Ha Wong; 
  • Tai Hing Lam; 
  • Man Ping Wang

ABSTRACT

Background:

Electronic health (eHealth) literacy would facilitate online information seeking and taking informed measures.

Objective:

We studied socioeconomic disparities in eHealth literacy and online COVID-19 information seeking, and their associations with COVID-19 preventive behaviors.

Methods:

The COVID-19 Health Information Survey (CoVHIns), using landline (n=500) and online surveys (n=1001), was conducted in adults in Hong Kong in April 2020. Chinese eHealth literacy scale (eHEALS, range 8¬–40) was used to measure eHealth literacy. COVID-19 preventive behaviors included wearing surgical masks, wearing fabric masks, washing hands, social distancing, and adding water/bleach to the household drainage system. Adjusted beta-coefficients and the slope indices of inequality (SII) for eHEALS score by socioeconomic status, adjusted odds ratios (aOR) for online COVID-19 information seeking by socioeconomic status, and aORs for high adherence to preventive behaviors by eHEALS score and online COVID-19 information seeking were calculated.

Results:

The mean score of eHEALS was 26.10 (standard deviation, 7.70). Age was inversely, but education and personal income were positively associated with eHEALS score and online COVID-19 information seeking (all P for trend <0.05). Participants who sought online COVID-19 information showed high adherence to wearing surgical mask (aOR 1.56 95% CI [1.15-2.13]), washing hand (aOR 1.33 [1.05-1.71]), social distancing (aOR 1.48 [1.14-1.93]), and adding water/bleach to household drainage system (aOR 1.67 [1.28-2.18]). Those with the highest eHEALS score was associated with high adherence to wearing surgical mask (aOR 3.84 [1.63-9.05]), washing hand (aOR 4.14 [2.46-6.96]), social distancing (aOR 2.25 [1.39-3.65]), and adding water/bleach to the household drainage system (aOR 1.94 [1.19-3.16]), compared those with the lowest eHEALS score.

Conclusions:

Chinese adults with higher socioeconomic status had higher eHealth literacy and online COVID-19 information seeking; both were associated with high adherence to the guideline on preventive behaviors during the COVID-19 pandemic.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Guo Z, Zhao S, Guo N, Wu Y, Weng X, Wong JYH, Lam TH, Wang MP

Socioeconomic Disparities in eHealth Literacy and Preventive Behaviors During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Hong Kong: Cross-sectional Study

J Med Internet Res 2021;23(4):e24577

DOI: 10.2196/24577

PMID: 33784240

PMCID: 8048711

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.