Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research

Date Submitted: Sep 22, 2020
Open Peer Review Period: Sep 20, 2020 - Nov 15, 2020
Date Accepted: Sep 20, 2021
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Twitter Use by Academic Nuclear Medicine Programs: Pilot Content Analysis Study

Panda A, Sharma A, Dundar A, Packard A, Aase L, Kotsenas A, Kendi AT

Twitter Use by Academic Nuclear Medicine Programs: Pilot Content Analysis Study

JMIR Form Res 2021;5(11):e24448

DOI: 10.2196/24448

PMID: 34747708

PMCID: 8663684

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Social media use by Academic Nuclear Medicine Programs – a value proposition in waiting

  • Ananya Panda; 
  • Akash Sharma; 
  • Ayca Dundar; 
  • Ann Packard; 
  • Lee Aase; 
  • Amy Kotsenas; 
  • Ayse Tuba Kendi

ABSTRACT

Background:

Despite the increasing trend for social media use at large, particularly Twitter by radiologists in recent years, there is little insight into the presence of Nuclear Medicine (NM) and Nuclear Radiology (NR) programs on social media.

Objective:

There is scant insight into the presence of Nuclear Medicine (NM) and Nuclear Radiology (NR) programs on social media. Our purpose was to assess Twitter engagement by academic NM/NR programs in the United States.

Methods:

We measured Twitter engagement by the academic NM/NR community, accounting for various NM/NR certification pathways. The Twitter presence of NM/NR programs at both department and program director (PD) level was identified. Tweets by programs were cross-referenced against potential high-yield NM/NR related hashtags, and tabulated at a binary level. A brief survey was done to identify obstacles and benefits to Twitter use by academic NM/NR faculty.

Results:

For 2019-2020, 88 unique programs offered NM/NR certification pathways. Of these, 52% (46/88) had Twitter accounts and 24% (21/88) had at least one post related to NM/NR. Only three radiology departments had unique Twitter accounts for the NM/Molecular Imaging division. Of remaining 103 radiology residency programs, only 16% (16/103) had presence on Twitter and 5% (5/103) had tweets about NM/NR. Only 9% (8/88) NM/NR PDs were on Twitter, and three PDs tweeted about NM/NR. The survey revealed a lack of clarity and resources for using Twitter, although the respondents acknowledged a perceived value of Twitter engagement for attracting younger trainees.

Conclusions:

Currently, there is minimal Twitter engagement by the academic NM/NR community. The identifiable obstacles are balanced by perceived value in engagement. Not increasing the social media presence is a missed opportunity for trainees, colleagues, and the public with respect to the value of this subspecialty. Clinical Trial: None


 Citation

Please cite as:

Panda A, Sharma A, Dundar A, Packard A, Aase L, Kotsenas A, Kendi AT

Twitter Use by Academic Nuclear Medicine Programs: Pilot Content Analysis Study

JMIR Form Res 2021;5(11):e24448

DOI: 10.2196/24448

PMID: 34747708

PMCID: 8663684

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.