Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Sep 16, 2020
Date Accepted: Jan 20, 2021

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Blended Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Versus Face-to-face Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Older Adults With Anxiety Symptoms in Primary Care: Pragmatic Single-blind Cluster Randomized Trial

Witlox M, Garnefski N, Kraaij V, de Waal MW, Smit F, Bohlmeijer E, Spinhoven P

Blended Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Versus Face-to-face Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Older Adults With Anxiety Symptoms in Primary Care: Pragmatic Single-blind Cluster Randomized Trial

J Med Internet Res 2021;23(3):e24366

DOI: 10.2196/24366

PMID: 33769293

PMCID: 8088844

Blended acceptance and commitment therapy versus face-to-face cognitive behavioral therapy for older adults with anxiety symptoms in primary care: a pragmatic single-blind cluster-randomized trial

  • Maartje Witlox; 
  • Nadia Garnefski; 
  • Vivian Kraaij; 
  • Margot W.M. de Waal; 
  • Filip Smit; 
  • Ernst Bohlmeijer; 
  • Philip Spinhoven

ABSTRACT

Background:

Anxiety symptoms in older adults are highly prevalent and disabling, but often go untreated. Most trials on psychological interventions for late-life anxiety have examined face-to-face cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT). To bridge the current treatment gap, other treatment approaches and delivery formats should also be evaluated.

Objective:

This study was the first to examine a blended acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) intervention for older adults with anxiety symptoms, comparing it to face-to-face CBT.

Methods:

Adults aged 55-75 (n=314) with mild to moderately severe anxiety symptoms were recruited from general practices and cluster-randomized to either blended ACT or face-to-face CBT. Assessments took place at baseline (T0), posttreatment (T1) and 6- and 12-month follow-up (T2, T3). Anxiety symptom severity (GAD-7) was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes were positive mental health, depression symptom severity, functional impairment, presence of (a) DSM-V anxiety disorder(s) and treatment satisfaction.

Results:

Conditions did not differ significantly regarding change of anxiety symptom severity during the study period (T0-T1: b=0.18, P=.73; T1-T2: b=-0.63, P=.26; T1-T3: b=-0.33, P=.59). Large reductions in anxiety symptom severity (d ≥0.96) were found in both conditions at posttreatment and these were maintained at twelve-month follow-up. Rates of clinically significant change in anxiety symptoms were also not different for blended ACT and CBT (χ2=0.17, P=.68). Regarding secondary outcomes, long-term effects on positive mental health were significantly stronger in the blended ACT-group (b=0.27, P=.03, d=0.29) and treatment satisfaction was significantly higher for blended ACT than CBT (b=3.19, p <.001, d=0.78). No other differences between the conditions were found on the secondary outcomes.

Conclusions:

The results show that blended ACT is a valuable treatment alternative to CBT for late-life anxiety. Clinical Trial: Netherlands Trial Register: TRIAL NL6131 (NTR6270); https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/6131


 Citation

Please cite as:

Witlox M, Garnefski N, Kraaij V, de Waal MW, Smit F, Bohlmeijer E, Spinhoven P

Blended Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Versus Face-to-face Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Older Adults With Anxiety Symptoms in Primary Care: Pragmatic Single-blind Cluster Randomized Trial

J Med Internet Res 2021;23(3):e24366

DOI: 10.2196/24366

PMID: 33769293

PMCID: 8088844

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.