Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR mHealth and uHealth

Date Submitted: Sep 15, 2020
Date Accepted: Jan 5, 2021

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Bed Sensor Technology for Objective Sleep Monitoring Within the Clinical Rehabilitation Setting: Observational Feasibility Study

Hendriks MM, van Lotringen JH, Vos - van der Hulst M, Keijsers NL

Bed Sensor Technology for Objective Sleep Monitoring Within the Clinical Rehabilitation Setting: Observational Feasibility Study

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2021;9(2):e24339

DOI: 10.2196/24339

PMID: 33555268

PMCID: 7971768

Bed Sensor Technology for Objective Sleep Monitoring within the Clinical Rehabilitation Setting: a Feasibility Study

  • Maartje MS Hendriks; 
  • Jaap H van Lotringen; 
  • Marije Vos - van der Hulst; 
  • Noël LW Keijsers

ABSTRACT

Background:

Since adequate sleep is essential for optimal inpatient rehabilitation, there is an increased interest in sleep assessment. Unobtrusive contactless portable bed sensors show great perspective for objective sleep analysis.

Objective:

The aim of the current study was to investigate the feasibility of a bed sensor for continuous sleep monitoring overnight in a clinical rehabilitation center.

Methods:

Patients with incomplete spinal cord injury (iSCI) or stroke were monitored overnight for an one week period during their inhospital rehabilitation using the Emfit QS bed sensor. Feasibility was examined based on missing measurement nights, coverage percentages and missing periods of heart rate (HR) and respiratory rate (RR). Furthermore, descriptive data of sleep related parameters (nocturnal HR, RR, and movement activity and bed exits) were reported.

Results:

In total, 24 participants (12 iSCI, 12 stroke) were measured. Five (3.8%) of the 130 nights had no sensor data due to Wi-Fi (2), slipping away (1), or unknown (2) errors. Coverage percentages of HR and RR were 97% and 93% for iSCI and 99% and 97% for stroke participants. Two-third of the missing HR and RR periods had a short duration of ≤120 s. Patients with an iSCI had an average nocturnal HR of 72 (13) beats per minute (bpm), RR of 16 (3) cycles per minute (cpm), and movement activity of 239 (116) activity points (AP), and had 86 reported and 84 recorded bed exits. Patients with a stroke had an average nocturnal HR of 61 (8) bpm, RR of 15 (1) cpm, and movement activity of 136 (49) AP, and had 42 reported and 57 recorded bed exits. Patients with an iSCI had significantly higher nocturnal HR (t(18)=-2.1, p=.042) and movement activity (t(18)=-1.2, p=.024) compared to stroke patients. Furthermore, there was a difference between self-reported and recorded bed exits per night in 15 of the 57 nights for iSCI patients and in 16 of the 42 nights for stroke patients.

Conclusions:

It is feasible to implement the bed sensor for continuous sleep monitoring in the clinical rehabilitation setting. The current study provides good foundation for further bed sensor development addressing sleep types and sleep disorders, to optimize care for rehabilitants.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Hendriks MM, van Lotringen JH, Vos - van der Hulst M, Keijsers NL

Bed Sensor Technology for Objective Sleep Monitoring Within the Clinical Rehabilitation Setting: Observational Feasibility Study

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2021;9(2):e24339

DOI: 10.2196/24339

PMID: 33555268

PMCID: 7971768

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.