Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
Date Submitted: Sep 11, 2020
Date Accepted: Jun 29, 2021
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Peer assisted HIV self-testing increases positivity rates among key populations in Burundi
ABSTRACT
Background:
In Burundi, given the low testing numbers among key populations, peer assisted HIV self-testing (HIVST) was initiated for female sex workers (FSWs), men who have sex with men (MSM), and transgender people (TG) to provide another testing option. HIVST was provided by existing peer outreach workers (POWs) who were trained to provide support before, during, and after the administration of the test. People who screened reactive were referred and actively linked to confirmatory testing, and those confirmed positive were linked to treatment. Standard testing included HIV testing by clinical staff either at mobile clinics or in facilities.
Objective:
The objective was to improve access to HIV testing to underserved KP members, increase HIV positivity rates, and link those who were confirmed HIV positive with life-saving treatment for epidemic control.
Methods:
A descriptive analysis of routine programmatic data was conducted from a nine-month implementation period (June 2018-March 2019) of peer assisted HIVST among FSWs, MSM, and TG in six provinces where the USAID- and PEPFAR-funded LINKAGES Burundi project worked. Chi-squared tests were used to compare case-finding rates among individuals tested through HIVST versus standard testing.
Results:
A total of 2,198 HIVST test kits were administered (1,791 FSWs, 363 MSM, 44 TG). Three hundred and sixty-six people (17%) were reactive to HIV screening (296 FSWs, 60 MSM, 10 TG); 314 (14%) were confirmed HIV positive (257 FSWs, 47 MSM, 10 TG); and 301 (96%) (251 FSWs, 40 MSM, 10 TG) of those confirmed were initiated on treatment. HIV case-finding rates were significantly higher with HIVST compared to standard testing for FSW and MSM but not TG: FSWs (14% vs. 9%, P < .001); MSM (13% vs. 4%, P < .001); and TG (23% vs. 17%, P > .10). ART initiation rates were significantly lower for MSM confirmed HIV positive through HIVST than through standard testing (85% vs. 99%, P < .001) but not among FSWs or TG (FSWs: 98% vs. 97%, P > .10; TG: 100% vs. 100%).
Conclusions:
The results demonstrate the potential effectiveness of HIVST in identifying individuals who are living with HIV.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.