Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Sep 10, 2020
Date Accepted: Jan 18, 2021
Date Submitted to PubMed: Jan 21, 2021

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

A Machine Learning Prediction Model of Respiratory Failure Within 48 Hours of Patient Admission for COVID-19: Model Development and Validation

Bolourani S, Brenner M, Wang P, McGinn T, Hirsch J, Barnaby D, Zanos T, Northwell COVID-19 Research Consortium

A Machine Learning Prediction Model of Respiratory Failure Within 48 Hours of Patient Admission for COVID-19: Model Development and Validation

J Med Internet Res 2021;23(2):e24246

DOI: 10.2196/24246

PMID: 33476281

PMCID: 7879728

Development and Validation of a Machine learning prediction model of respiratory failure within 48 hours of patient admission for COVID-19

  • Siavash Bolourani; 
  • Max Brenner; 
  • Ping Wang; 
  • Thomas McGinn; 
  • Jamie Hirsch; 
  • Douglas Barnaby; 
  • Theodoros Zanos; 
  • Northwell COVID-19 Research Consortium

ABSTRACT

Background:

Predicting respiratory failure in COVID-19 patients based on an early clinical profile can help triaging, resource allocation, and morbidity reduction by appropriately monitoring patients at risk. Given the complexity of the disease, this effort can benefit from machine learning (ML) approaches.

Objective:

Our objective is to establish a machine learning model that predicts respiratory failure within 48 hours of admission based on data from the emergency department (ED).

Methods:

Data was collected from patients with COVID-19 who were admitted to Northwell Health acute care hospitals and discharged, died, or spent a minimum of 48 hours in the hospital between March 1, 2020 and May 11, 2020. Of 11,525 patients, 933 (8.1%) were placed on invasive mechanical ventilation within 48 hours of admission. The variables used by the models included clinical and laboratory data commonly collected in the ED. We trained and validated an XgBoost model alongside two other prediction models using cross hospitals validation. We compared model performance and a Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS) using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, precision-recall (PR) curves, and other metrics.

Results:

The XgBoost model had the highest mean accuracy of 0.908 (AUC = 0.83), outperforming MEWS and the other models. Important variables included the type of oxygen delivery used in the ED, patient age, emergency severity score, respiratory rate, serum lactate, heart rate, and serum glucose values.

Conclusions:

XgBoost has high predictive accuracy, outperforming other early warning scores. The clinical plausibility and predictive ability of XgBoost suggest that the model could be used to predict 48-hour respiratory failure in admitted patients with COVID-19.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Bolourani S, Brenner M, Wang P, McGinn T, Hirsch J, Barnaby D, Zanos T, Northwell COVID-19 Research Consortium

A Machine Learning Prediction Model of Respiratory Failure Within 48 Hours of Patient Admission for COVID-19: Model Development and Validation

J Med Internet Res 2021;23(2):e24246

DOI: 10.2196/24246

PMID: 33476281

PMCID: 7879728

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.