Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research
Date Submitted: Sep 10, 2020
Date Accepted: Oct 28, 2020
Date Submitted to PubMed: Nov 16, 2020
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Identifying post-COVID vulnerable groups: A cross-sectional survey among different professions in China during the final stage of lockdown
ABSTRACT
Background:
COVID-19 has resulted in considerable mental health burden in the Chinese general population and health care workers at the beginning and peak of the pandemic. However, little is known about potentially vulnerable groups during the final stage of the lockdown.
Objective:
The aim of this survey study was to assess the mental health burden of different professions in China in order to find vulnerable groups, possible influencing factors, and the successful ways of coping during the last four weeks of the lockdown in Hubei province.
Methods:
A cross-sectional online survey asked participants about current residence, daily working hours, exposure to COVID-19 at work and media preferences. We used Depression-Anxiety-Stress Scales (DASS-21) for the assessment of mental health. Further assessments included perceived stress (CPSS-14), coping strategies for all participants and specific stressors for health care workers. We follow the reporting guidelines of the STROBE statements for observational studies.
Results:
The sample (N=687) consisted of 158 doctors, 221 nurses, 24 other medical staff, 43 students, 60 teachers/government staff, 135 economy staff, 26 workers/farmers and 20 others. We found 17.9% cases of increased depression, 30.3% anxiety and 13.7% stress. Other medical staff and students were vulnerable to depression while doctors, nurses and students were vulnerable to anxiety. Other medical staff, students and economy staff were vulnerable to stress. Coping strategies were reduced to three factors: active, mental and emotional. Being female and emotional coping were independently associated with depression, anxiety or stress. Applying active coping strategies showed lower odds for anxiety while mental coping strategies showed lower odds for depression, anxiety and stress. Age, being inside a lockdown area, exposure to COVID-19 at work and having a high workload (8-12h per day) was not associated with any symptoms. WeChat was the preferred way of staying informed in all groups.
Conclusions:
By the end of the lockdown a considerable part of the Chinese population showed increased levels of depression and anxiety. Students and other medical staff were the most affected, while economy staff were highly stressed. Doctors and nurses need support regarding potential anxiety disorders. Future work should focus on longitudinal results of the pandemic and develop targeted preventive measures. Clinical Trial: not applicable
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.