Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Sep 10, 2020
Date Accepted: Jun 30, 2021

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

One Decade of Online Patient Feedback: Longitudinal Analysis of Data From a German Physician Rating Website

Emmert M, McLennan S

One Decade of Online Patient Feedback: Longitudinal Analysis of Data From a German Physician Rating Website

J Med Internet Res 2021;23(7):e24229

DOI: 10.2196/24229

PMID: 34309579

PMCID: 8367114

One Decade of Online Patient Feedback: A Longitudinal Analysis of Data from a German Physician Rating Website

  • Martin Emmert; 
  • Stuart McLennan

ABSTRACT

Background:

Feedback from patients is an essential element of a patient-oriented health care system. Physician rating websites (PRWs) are a key way patients can provide feedback online.

Objective:

This study analyzes an entire decade of online ratings for all medical specialties on the leading German PRW.

Methods:

The paper presents retrospective analysis of all scaled-survey online ratings, which were posted on jameda between 2010 and 2019. Statistical analysis was carried out using Mann-Whitney U test and Kruskal–Wallis test. In addition, a second degree polynomial regression model assessed the association between the mean overall performance of rated physicians and the number of ratings per physician.

Results:

In total, 1,906,146 ratings were posted on jameda between 2010 and 2019 for 127,921 physicians. The number of rated physicians increased constantly from 19,305 in 2010 to 82,511 in 2018, respectively. The average number of ratings per rated physicians increased from 1.65 (SD 1.56) in 2010 to 3.19 (SD 4.69) in 2019. Overall, 75.2% of all ratings were in the best rating category of “very good”, and 5.7% of the ratings were in the lowest category of “insufficient”. However, the mean of all ratings was shown to be 1.76 (SD 1.53) with a relatively constant distribution over time. General practitioners, internists, and gynecologists received the highest number of ratings (343,242, 266,899, and 232,914, respectively). Male patients, those of higher age, and those covered by private health insurance gave significantly (p<.001) more favorable evaluations than did their counterparts. Physicians with a lower number of ratings tended to receive ratings across the rating scale, while physicians with a higher number of ratings tended to have better ratings. Regression analysis identified an inverse U-shaped relationship, with a positive association between the number of ratings and average rating seen until a physician achieved 138 ratings. Thereafter, a negative relationship was seen.

Conclusions:

Online ratings have been increasing tremendously over the past decade and become an essential element for patients to leave feedback on the care they receive. More than half of all physicians have been rated online on jameda each year in Germany since 2016. With patients increasingly using the internet for their health care and PRWs adding additional features, the importance of online patient feedback will likely only intensify.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Emmert M, McLennan S

One Decade of Online Patient Feedback: Longitudinal Analysis of Data From a German Physician Rating Website

J Med Internet Res 2021;23(7):e24229

DOI: 10.2196/24229

PMID: 34309579

PMCID: 8367114

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.