Accepted for/Published in: JMIR mHealth and uHealth
Date Submitted: Sep 8, 2020
Date Accepted: Mar 8, 2021
Date Submitted to PubMed: Mar 22, 2021
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
COVID-19 Pandemic: Gender difference in satisfaction with a daily supportive text message program (Text4Hope) and preference for technology-based health supports during emergencies
ABSTRACT
Background:
During the unprecedented time of the COVID-19 pandemic, the need to support mental wellbeing is urgent. In March 2020, Text4Hope was provided as a community health service to Alberta residents. This free service aims to promote psychological resilience and alleviate pandemic-associated stress, anxiety, and depression symptoms.
Objective:
This study aimed to evaluate Text4Hope subscribers’ experience, satisfaction, and perspectives related to technology-based support during crisis or emergency situations, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, by gender.
Methods:
Individuals self-subscribe to Text4Hope to receive daily supportive text messages for three months. Subscribers were invited to complete an online survey at six weeks to collect service satisfaction related information. Overall satisfaction was assessed on a scale from 0 to 10 using the one sample t-test and Likert scale satisfaction responses were used to assess various aspects of the Text4Hope program. Gender differences were measured by using One-Way ANOVA test and Chi-Square analysis.
Results:
Overall service satisfaction was high (8.55/10 (SD=1.78) and more than 70% of subscribers agreed that Text4Hope helped them to cope with stress and anxiety, feel connected to a support system, manage COVID-19 related issues, and improve mental wellbeing. Similarly, subscribers agreed that messages were positive, affirmative, and succinct. Messages were read by 97.9% of respondents always or often and more than 20% returned to messages always or often. The majority of subscribers (89.3%) read the messages and either reflected upon them or took a positive action. Subscribers welcomed almost all technology-based services as part of their health care during crisis or emergency situations (70%). Text4Hope was more effective among females, who reported higher satisfaction rates and improved coping after receiving text messages.
Conclusions:
Text4Hope successfully captured subscribers’ satisfaction and acceptance, during COVID-19 pandemic. Respondents affirmed the high quality of the messages with their positive feedback. Technology-based services can provide remotely accessible, cost-effective, and population-level interventions that align with recommended distancing practices during pandemics. Text4Hope subscriber feedback revealed high satisfaction and acceptance rates after six weeks of receiving daily messages. Clinical Trial: The study protocol was approved by the Research and Ethics Board of the University of Alberta (Pro00086163).
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.