Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Sep 7, 2020
Date Accepted: May 24, 2021

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

The Challenges and Pitfalls of Detecting Sleep Hypopnea Using a Wearable Optical Sensor: Comparative Study

Zhang Z, Qi M, Hügli G, Khatami R

The Challenges and Pitfalls of Detecting Sleep Hypopnea Using a Wearable Optical Sensor: Comparative Study

J Med Internet Res 2021;23(7):e24171

DOI: 10.2196/24171

PMID: 34326039

PMCID: 8367170

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Can we trust the smartwatch and armband in screening obstructive sleep apnea?

  • Zhongxing Zhang; 
  • Ming Qi; 
  • Gordana Hügli; 
  • Ramin Khatami

ABSTRACT

Background:

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is the most prevalent respiratory sleep disorder occurring in 9-38% of the general population. But about 90% of the suspected OSA patients go undiagnosed due to the lack of sleep laboratories/specialists and the high-cost of in-lab polysomnography (PSG) diagnosis, leading to decreased life qualities and increased healthcare burden in cardio-/cerebrovascular diseases. Wearable sleep trackers like smartwatches/armbands are booming, creating a hope of cost-efficient at-home OSA screening and assessment of treatment (e.g., continuous positive airway pressure [CPAP] therapy) effectiveness. However, such wearables currently are still not available. One of the major limitations in measuring OSA with wearables is the detection of sleep hypopnea. Because sleep apnea is defined by a complete pause/stop of breathing and many wearables can measure surrogate markers for breathing frequency, but hypopnea is defined by ≥ 30% drop in breathing and at least 3% drop in peripheral capillary oxygen saturation (SpO2) measured at fingertip. Whether the conventional measures of oxygen desaturation (OD) at the fingertip and at the arm/wrist are identical, is essentially unknown.

Objective:

We aimed to compare event-by-event the arm OD (arm_OD) with the fingertip OD (finger_OD) in sleep hypopneas during both naïve sleep and CPAP therapy.

Methods:

30 OSA patients did the incremental stepwise CPAP titration protocol during all-night in-lab video-PSG monitoring, i.e., 1-h baseline sleep without CPAP followed by stepwise increment of 1-cmH2O pressure per-hour starting from 5-8 cmH2O depending on the individuals. The arm_OD of left bicep muscular and the finger_OD of left index fingertip in sleep hypopneas were simultaneously measured by frequency-domain near-infrared spectroscopy and video-PSG photoplethysmography, respectively. Bland-Altman plots were used to illustrate the agreements between arm_OD and finger_OD during baseline sleep and under CPAP, respectively. T-test tested whether the differences between arm_OD and finger_OD were significantly different from 0 (P<.05).

Results:

Totally 2185 hypopneas from our patients were analyzed, including 668 ones during baseline sleep and 1517 ones during CPAP. The mean difference between finger_OD and arm_OD was 2.86% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.67-3.06%, t-test: P<.001) during baseline sleep and 1.83% (95% CI: 1.72-1.94%, t-test: P<.001) during CPAP, with the 95% limits of agreement as [-2.27%, 8.00%] and [-2.54%, 6.19%], respectively. Using the criterion of arm_OD ≥3% can only define 16.32% (109/668) and 14.90% (226/1517) hypopneas at baseline and during CPAP, respectively.

Conclusions:

arm_OD is 2-3% smaller than standard finger_OD in sleep hypopnea, probably because the measured arm_OD physiologically comes from arterioles, venules and capillaries thus the venous blood adversely affects its value. Our findings cannot recommend directly using a drop of ≥ 3% OD at arm/wrist as a criterion to define hypopnea because it could provide large false negative results in screening OSA and assessing the CPAP treatment effectiveness.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Zhang Z, Qi M, Hügli G, Khatami R

The Challenges and Pitfalls of Detecting Sleep Hypopnea Using a Wearable Optical Sensor: Comparative Study

J Med Internet Res 2021;23(7):e24171

DOI: 10.2196/24171

PMID: 34326039

PMCID: 8367170

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.