Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Oct 17, 2020
Date Accepted: Mar 22, 2021

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Generalizability of an Automatic Explanation Method for Machine Learning Prediction Results on Asthma-Related Hospital Visits in Patients With Asthma: Quantitative Analysis

Luo G, Nau CL, Crawford WW, Schatz M, Zeiger RS, Koebnick C

Generalizability of an Automatic Explanation Method for Machine Learning Prediction Results on Asthma-Related Hospital Visits in Patients With Asthma: Quantitative Analysis

J Med Internet Res 2021;23(4):e24153

DOI: 10.2196/24153

PMID: 33856359

PMCID: 8085752

Assessing the Generalizability of an Automatic Explanation Method for Machine Learning Prediction Results: A Secondary Analysis on Forecasting Asthma-Related Hospital Visits in Patients with Asthma

  • Gang Luo; 
  • Claudia L Nau; 
  • William W Crawford; 
  • Michael Schatz; 
  • Robert S Zeiger; 
  • Corinna Koebnick

ABSTRACT

Background:

Asthma brings a huge burden to patients and healthcare systems. To facilitate preventive care for asthma management and improve patient outcomes, we recently developed two machine learning models, one on Intermountain Healthcare data and the other on Kaiser Permanente Southern California (KSPC) data, to forecast asthma-related hospital visits including emergency department visits and hospitalizations in the succeeding 12 months in patients with asthma. As is typical for machine learning approaches, these two models give no explanation of their forecasting results. To address black-box models’ interpretability issue, we designed an automatic method to supply rule-format explanations for any machine learning model’s forecasting results on imbalanced tabular data and to suggest customized interventions with no accuracy loss. Our method worked well for explaining our Intermountain Healthcare model’s forecasting results, but its generalizability to other healthcare systems stays unknown.

Objective:

This study aims to evaluate our automatic explanation method’s generalizability to KPSC for forecasting asthma-related hospital visits.

Methods:

Through secondary analysis of 987,506 data instances from 2012 to 2017 at KSPC, we employed our method to explain our KPSC model’s forecasting results and to suggest customized interventions. The patient cohort covered a random sample of 70% of patients with asthma who had a KPSC health plan for any period between 2015 and 2018.

Results:

Our method explained the forecasting results for 97.57% (2,204/2,259) of the patients with asthma our KPSC model correctly forecasted to undergo asthma-related hospital visits in the succeeding 12 months.

Conclusions:

For forecasting asthma-related hospital visits, our automatic explanation method exhibited decent generalizability to KPSC.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Luo G, Nau CL, Crawford WW, Schatz M, Zeiger RS, Koebnick C

Generalizability of an Automatic Explanation Method for Machine Learning Prediction Results on Asthma-Related Hospital Visits in Patients With Asthma: Quantitative Analysis

J Med Internet Res 2021;23(4):e24153

DOI: 10.2196/24153

PMID: 33856359

PMCID: 8085752

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.