Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR mHealth and uHealth

Date Submitted: Sep 26, 2020
Date Accepted: Mar 25, 2021

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Examining the Impact of a Mobile Health App on Functional Movement and Physical Fitness: Pilot Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial

Stork M, Bell E, Jung M

Examining the Impact of a Mobile Health App on Functional Movement and Physical Fitness: Pilot Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2021;9(5):e24076

DOI: 10.2196/24076

PMID: 34047704

PMCID: 8196352

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Examining the Impact of an mHealth App on Functional Movement and Physical Fitness: A Pilot Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial

  • Matthew Stork; 
  • Ethan Bell; 
  • Mary Jung

ABSTRACT

Background:

Thousands of mobile apps available for download are geared towards health and fitness, yet limited research has evaluated the real-world effectiveness of such apps. The movr app is designed to enhance physical functioning by prescribing functional movement training based on individualized movement assessments. movr’s influence on functional movement and physical fitness (flexibility, strength, and cardiovascular fitness) has not yet been established empirically.

Objective:

To examine the real-world impact of movr on functional movement, flexibility, strength, and cardiovascular fitness (V̇O2max).

Methods:

Forty-eight healthy adults (24 women, 24 men; 24 ± 5 years) completed an 8-week pilot pragmatic randomized control trial whereby they were randomly assigned to either 8 weeks of use of the movr app (n = 24) or 8 weeks waitlist control (n = 24). Measures of functional movement, strength, flexibility, and V̇O2max were collected at baseline and 8-week follow-up.

Results:

Repeated-measures ANOVAs revealed significant group by time interactions for the 100-point Functional Movement Screen (FMS), shoulder flexibility, active straight-leg raise, half-kneeling dorsiflexion, and push-up tests (Ps < .05), such that pre- to post-intervention improvements were found in the movr group (Ps < .05), but not in the control group (Ps > .05). There were no changes in the sit and reach or handgrip strength test scores for either group Ps > .05). A significant main effect of time was found for countermovement jump (P = .02), such that scores decreased pre- to post-intervention in the control group (P = .02), but not in the movr group (P = .38). Finally, a significant group by time interaction was found for V̇O2max (P = .001), revealing that scores decreased pre- to post-intervention in the control group (P < .001), but not in the movr group (P = .54).

Conclusions:

The movr app holds potential for improving functional movement and physical fitness among healthy adults.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Stork M, Bell E, Jung M

Examining the Impact of a Mobile Health App on Functional Movement and Physical Fitness: Pilot Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2021;9(5):e24076

DOI: 10.2196/24076

PMID: 34047704

PMCID: 8196352

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.