Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.
Who will be affected?
Readers: No access to all 28 journals. We recommend accessing our articles via PubMed Central
Authors: No access to the submission form or your user account.
Reviewers: No access to your user account. Please download manuscripts you are reviewing for offline reading before Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 7:00 PM.
Editors: No access to your user account to assign reviewers or make decisions.
Copyeditors: No access to user account. Please download manuscripts you are copyediting before Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 7:00 PM.
Allan S, Mcleod H, Bradstreet S, Bell I, Whitehill H, Wilson-Kay A, Clark A, Matrunola C, Morton E, Farhall J, Gleeson J, Gumley A
Perspectives of Trial Staff on the Barriers to Recruitment in a Digital Intervention for Psychosis and How to Work Around Them: Qualitative Study Within a Trial
Trial staff views on barriers to recruitment in a digital intervention for psychosis and how to work around them: A qualitative study within a trial using focus groups and observation
Stephanie Allan;
Hamish Mcleod;
Simon Bradstreet;
Imogen Bell;
Helen Whitehill;
Alison Wilson-Kay;
Andrea Clark;
Claire Matrunola;
Emma Morton;
John Farhall;
John Gleeson;
Andrew Gumley
ABSTRACT
Background:
Recruitment processes for clinical trials of digital interventions for psychosis are seldom described in detail within
the literature. While trial staff have expertise in describing barriers and facilitators to recruitment a specific focus on understanding recruitment from the point of view of trial staff is rare and since trial staff are responsible for meeting recruitment targets, a lack of research on their point of view is a key limitation.
Objective:
The primary aim of this study was to understand recruitment from the point of view of trial staff and discover what
they considered to be important.
Methods:
We applied pluralistic ethnographic methods including analysis of trial documents, observation and focus groups explored the recruitment processes of the EMPOWER feasibility trial (ISRCTN: 99559262)
Results:
Recruitment barriers fell into two main themes; service characteristics (lack of time available to mental health staff to support recruitment, staff turnover, patient turnover (within Australia only), management styles of community mental health teams, physical environment) and clinician expectations (filtering effects and resistance to research participation). Trial staff negotiated these barriers through strategies such as emotional labour (trial staff managing feelings and expressions in order to successfully recruit participants) and trying to build relationships with clinical staff working within community mental health teams
Conclusions:
Researchers in clinical trials for digital psychosis interventions face numerous recruitment barriers and do their
best to work flexibly negotiate these barriers and meet recruitment targets. The recruitment process appeared to be enhanced by trial staff supporting each other throughout the recruitment stage of the trial. Clinical Trial: ISRCTN: 99559262
Citation
Please cite as:
Allan S, Mcleod H, Bradstreet S, Bell I, Whitehill H, Wilson-Kay A, Clark A, Matrunola C, Morton E, Farhall J, Gleeson J, Gumley A
Perspectives of Trial Staff on the Barriers to Recruitment in a Digital Intervention for Psychosis and How to Work Around Them: Qualitative Study Within a Trial