Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Human Factors

Date Submitted: Sep 2, 2020
Date Accepted: Dec 23, 2020

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Perspectives of Trial Staff on the Barriers to Recruitment in a Digital Intervention for Psychosis and How to Work Around Them: Qualitative Study Within a Trial

Allan S, Mcleod H, Bradstreet S, Bell I, Whitehill H, Wilson-Kay A, Clark A, Matrunola C, Morton E, Farhall J, Gleeson J, Gumley A

Perspectives of Trial Staff on the Barriers to Recruitment in a Digital Intervention for Psychosis and How to Work Around Them: Qualitative Study Within a Trial

JMIR Hum Factors 2021;8(1):e24055

DOI: 10.2196/24055

PMID: 33666555

PMCID: 7980120

Trial staff views on barriers to recruitment in a digital intervention for psychosis and how to work around them: A qualitative study within a trial using focus groups and observation

  • Stephanie Allan; 
  • Hamish Mcleod; 
  • Simon Bradstreet; 
  • Imogen Bell; 
  • Helen Whitehill; 
  • Alison Wilson-Kay; 
  • Andrea Clark; 
  • Claire Matrunola; 
  • Emma Morton; 
  • John Farhall; 
  • John Gleeson; 
  • Andrew Gumley

ABSTRACT

Background:

Recruitment processes for clinical trials of digital interventions for psychosis are seldom described in detail within the literature. While trial staff have expertise in describing barriers and facilitators to recruitment a specific focus on understanding recruitment from the point of view of trial staff is rare and since trial staff are responsible for meeting recruitment targets, a lack of research on their point of view is a key limitation.

Objective:

The primary aim of this study was to understand recruitment from the point of view of trial staff and discover what they considered to be important.

Methods:

We applied pluralistic ethnographic methods including analysis of trial documents, observation and focus groups explored the recruitment processes of the EMPOWER feasibility trial (ISRCTN: 99559262)

Results:

Recruitment barriers fell into two main themes; service characteristics (lack of time available to mental health staff to support recruitment, staff turnover, patient turnover (within Australia only), management styles of community mental health teams, physical environment) and clinician expectations (filtering effects and resistance to research participation). Trial staff negotiated these barriers through strategies such as emotional labour (trial staff managing feelings and expressions in order to successfully recruit participants) and trying to build relationships with clinical staff working within community mental health teams

Conclusions:

Researchers in clinical trials for digital psychosis interventions face numerous recruitment barriers and do their best to work flexibly negotiate these barriers and meet recruitment targets. The recruitment process appeared to be enhanced by trial staff supporting each other throughout the recruitment stage of the trial. Clinical Trial: ISRCTN: 99559262


 Citation

Please cite as:

Allan S, Mcleod H, Bradstreet S, Bell I, Whitehill H, Wilson-Kay A, Clark A, Matrunola C, Morton E, Farhall J, Gleeson J, Gumley A

Perspectives of Trial Staff on the Barriers to Recruitment in a Digital Intervention for Psychosis and How to Work Around Them: Qualitative Study Within a Trial

JMIR Hum Factors 2021;8(1):e24055

DOI: 10.2196/24055

PMID: 33666555

PMCID: 7980120

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.