Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Mental Health
Date Submitted: Aug 24, 2020
Date Accepted: Nov 30, 2020
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
The Impact of an Online Psychiatric Assessment on the Mental Health and Wellbeing of Participants Presenting with Depressive Symptoms: Longitudinal Observational Study
ABSTRACT
Background:
Online assessments of mental health concerns hold great potential for earlier, more cost-effective and more accurate diagnosis of psychiatric conditions compared to traditional interview-based methods.
Objective:
To assess the impact of a comprehensive online mental health assessment on mental health and wellbeing in over 2000 individuals presenting with symptoms of depression.
Methods:
Participants in the Delta Study presenting with depressive symptoms at baseline completed an online assessment which screened for mood and other psychiatric conditions. After completing the assessment, participants received a report containing their assessment results and personalised psychoeducation. After 6 and 12 months, participants were asked to rate the usefulness of the online assessment on different mental health-related outcomes, as well as to self-report on their recent help-seeking behaviour, diagnosis, medication and lifestyle changes. Additionally, general mental wellbeing was assessed at baseline and both follow-ups using the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (WEMWBS).
Results:
Data from all participants who completed either the 6-months or the 12-months follow-up (N=2064) were analysed. The majority of study participants rated the study as useful for their subjective mental wellbeing. This included talking more openly (68%) and understanding one’s mental health problems better (56%). While most participants (76%) found their assessment results useful, only a small proportion (15%) subsequently discussed them with a mental health professional, leading to only a small number of study participants receiving a new diagnosis (5%). Among those who were reviewed, new mood disorder diagnoses were predicted by the digital algorithm with high sensitivity (above 70%), and nearly half of the newly-diagnosed participants also had a corresponding change in medication. Furthermore, participants’ subjective wellbeing significantly improved over 12 months (baseline WEMWBS score: M=35.24, SD=8.11; 12-months WEMWBS score: M=41.19, SD=10.59). Significant positive predictors of follow-up subjective wellbeing included talking more openly, exercising more and having been reviewed by a psychiatrist.
Conclusions:
Our results suggest that completing an online mental health assessment and receiving personalised psychoeducation is associated with subjective mental health improvements, facilitated by increased self-awareness and subsequent utilisation of self-help interventions. Integrating online mental health assessments within primary and/or secondary care services could benefit patients further and expedite earlier diagnosis and effective treatment.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.