Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Aug 20, 2020
Date Accepted: Oct 19, 2020

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Using an Ontology to Facilitate More Accurate Coding of Social Prescriptions Addressing Social Determinants of Health: Feasibility Study

Jani A, Liyanage H, Okusi C, Sherlock J, Hoang U, Ferreira F, Yonova I, de Lusignan S

Using an Ontology to Facilitate More Accurate Coding of Social Prescriptions Addressing Social Determinants of Health: Feasibility Study

J Med Internet Res 2020;22(12):e23721

DOI: 10.2196/23721

PMID: 33306032

PMCID: 7762682

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Using an ontology to facilitate more accurate coding of social prescribing

  • Anant Jani; 
  • Harshana Liyanage; 
  • Cecilia Okusi; 
  • Julian Sherlock; 
  • Uy Hoang; 
  • Filipa Ferreira; 
  • Ivelina Yonova; 
  • Simon de Lusignan

ABSTRACT

Background:

Social prescribing is being supported by NHS England to address social determinants of health, which account for 80-90% of health outcomes. Despite its promise, there is a lack of data on what social prescribing activity is taking place. Though NHS England has attempted to overcome this problem by recommending three standardised primary care codes, these codes do not capture social prescribing activity to a level of granularity that would allow for fair attribution of outcomes to social prescribing.

Objective:

In this manuscript, we explore whether an alternative approach to coding social prescribing activity, specifically through a social prescribing ontology, can be used to capture a higher degree of detail on the social prescriptions used by primary care.

Methods:

The social prescribing ontology, implemented according to the web ontology language (OWL), was designed to cover several key concepts covering social determinants of health. READv2 and CTV3 codes were identified using the NHS Terms Browser. The Royal College of General Practitioners Research Surveillance Centre (RCGP RSC), a sentinel network of 1000 primary care practices across England covering a population of over 4,000,000 registered patients, was used for data analyses covering a period from January 2011 to December 2019.

Results:

668 codes capturing social prescriptions for different types of social needs were identified for the social prescribing ontology. For the period between January 2011 and December 2019, social prescribing ontology codes were used 5,504,037 times by RCGP RSC primary care practices as compared to 29,606 instances of ‘social prescribing’ codes, including NHS England’s recommended codes.

Conclusions:

A social prescribing ontology provides a powerful alternative to the codes currently recommended by NHS England to capture detailed social prescribing activity in England.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Jani A, Liyanage H, Okusi C, Sherlock J, Hoang U, Ferreira F, Yonova I, de Lusignan S

Using an Ontology to Facilitate More Accurate Coding of Social Prescriptions Addressing Social Determinants of Health: Feasibility Study

J Med Internet Res 2020;22(12):e23721

DOI: 10.2196/23721

PMID: 33306032

PMCID: 7762682

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.