Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Aug 13, 2020
Date Accepted: Apr 14, 2021

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Application of the eHealth Literacy Model in Digital Health Interventions: Scoping Review

El Benny M, Kabakian-Khasholian T, El-Jardali F, Bardus M

Application of the eHealth Literacy Model in Digital Health Interventions: Scoping Review

J Med Internet Res 2021;23(6):e23473

DOI: 10.2196/23473

PMID: 34081023

PMCID: 8212628

The application of the eHealth literacy model in digital health interventions: A scoping review of the literature

  • Mariam El Benny; 
  • Tamar Kabakian-Khasholian; 
  • Fadi El-Jardali; 
  • Marco Bardus

ABSTRACT

Background:

Digital health interventions (DHIs) are increasingly adopted worldwide to address various public health issues. In 2006, Norman and Skinner introduced the “eHealth literacy model”, encompassing six domains of skills and abilities (basic, health, information, scientific, media, and computer) needed to effectively understand, process, and act on health-related information. Little is known about whether these domains are assessed or accounted for in DHIs.

Objective:

To explore how DHIs assess and evaluate the eHealth literacy model, and understand what health conditions are addressed and which technologies are employed.

Methods:

We conducted a scoping review of the literature on DHIs, based on RCT design, and reporting the assessment of any domain of the eHealth literacy model. We searched the Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Excerpta Medica dataBASE (EMBASE), and Cochrane Library. We performed a duplicate selection and data extraction process; we charted the results according to the country of origin, health condition, technology used, and eHealth literacy domain.

Results:

We identified 132 unique DHIs, conducted in 26 different countries between 2001 and 2020. Most DHIs were conducted in English-speaking countries (81/132, 61%), were delivered via web (69/132, 52%), and addressed noncommunicable diseases (57/132, 43%), or mental health issues (26/132, 20%). None of the interventions assessed all six domains of the eHealth literacy model. Most studies focused on the domain of health literacy (96/132, 73%), followed by digital (19/132, 14%), basic and media (4/132, 3%), information and scientific literacy (1/132, 1%). Seven studies covered both health and digital literacy (5%).

Conclusions:

While many selected DHIs assessed health or digital literacy, no studies comprehensively evaluated all domains of the eHealth literacy model; this evidence might overlook important factors that can mediate or moderate the effects of these interventions. Future DHIs should comprehensively assess the eHealth literacy model while developing or evaluated interventions, in order to understand how and why interventions can be effective.


 Citation

Please cite as:

El Benny M, Kabakian-Khasholian T, El-Jardali F, Bardus M

Application of the eHealth Literacy Model in Digital Health Interventions: Scoping Review

J Med Internet Res 2021;23(6):e23473

DOI: 10.2196/23473

PMID: 34081023

PMCID: 8212628

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.