Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Aging

Date Submitted: Aug 7, 2020
Date Accepted: Nov 13, 2020

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Mobile Apps for Older Adults: Systematic Search and Evaluation Within Online Stores

Portenhauser AA, Terhorst Y, Schultchen D, Sander LB, Denkinger MM, Stach M, Waldherr N, Dallmeier D, Baumeister H, Meßner EM

Mobile Apps for Older Adults: Systematic Search and Evaluation Within Online Stores

JMIR Aging 2021;4(1):e23313

DOI: 10.2196/23313

PMID: 33605884

PMCID: 8081158

Mobile applications for older adults: A systematic review and evaluation within online stores

  • Alexandra A. Portenhauser; 
  • Yannik Terhorst; 
  • Dana Schultchen; 
  • Lasse B. Sander; 
  • Michael M. Denkinger; 
  • Michael Stach; 
  • Natalie Waldherr; 
  • Dhayana Dallmeier; 
  • Harald Baumeister; 
  • Eva-Maria Meßner

ABSTRACT

Background:

Through the increasing ageing population the health care system is confronted with a variety of challenges, such as expanding health care costs. To manage these challenges, mobile applications (MA) may represent a cost-effective and low-threshold approach to support older adults.

Objective:

This systematic review aimed to evaluate the quality, characteristics as well as privacy and security measures of MAs for older adults in the European commercial app stores.

Methods:

In the European Apple App and Google Play store, a web crawler systematically searched for MAs for older adults. The identified MAs were evaluated by two independent reviewers using the Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS). Correlation between user star ratings and the overall rating was calculated. Exploratory regression analysis was conducted to determine whether the obligation to pay fees predicted overall quality.

Results:

In total, 83 of 1,217 identified MAs were included in analysis. Generally, the MAs for older adults were of moderate quality (M=3.22, SD=0.68). Four MAs (4.8%) were evidence-based. Forty-one (49.4%) of the MAs had no security measures. The user star rating correlated significantly positively with the overall rating (r=.30, P<.05). Obligation to pay fees could not predict overall quality.

Conclusions:

There is an extensive quality range within MAs for older adults, indicating deficits in terms of information quality, data protection, and security precautions, as well as a lack of evidence-based approaches. Central databases are needed to identify high-quality MAs.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Portenhauser AA, Terhorst Y, Schultchen D, Sander LB, Denkinger MM, Stach M, Waldherr N, Dallmeier D, Baumeister H, Meßner EM

Mobile Apps for Older Adults: Systematic Search and Evaluation Within Online Stores

JMIR Aging 2021;4(1):e23313

DOI: 10.2196/23313

PMID: 33605884

PMCID: 8081158

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.