Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Medical Education
Date Submitted: Jul 23, 2020
Date Accepted: Apr 17, 2021
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
A Shared Decison-Making Virtual Patient in Medical Education: A mixed methods evaluation
ABSTRACT
Background:
Shared decision-making (SDM) is a process where clinicians and patients work together to select tests, treatments, management or support packages, based on clinical evidence and the patient’s informed preferences. Like any skill, SDM requires practice to improve. Virtual Patients (VPs) are simulations that allow one to practice their communication skills. VPs could be used to help professionals and students practice the communication skills required to engage in SDM, but this specific focus has not received much attention within the literature.
Objective:
To evaluate a VP workshop for medical students aimed at developing the communication skills required for SDM.
Methods:
A pre and post-intervention questionnaire followed by semi-structured interviews.
Results:
The interviews and questionnaires suggested that the VP was enjoyable and easy to use. When the participants were asked to rank their priorities in a consultation both pre and post-VP, there was a statistically significant change in the rank position of “respecting patient choices” (P = 0.038) with the median rank changing from 2nd to 1st. The VP allowed the participants to explore a consultation in a way that they could not with simulated or real patients; this may be part of the reason that the VP was suggested as a useful intervention for bridging from the early, theory focused years of the curriculum to the more patient focused ones later on.
Conclusions:
The VP was well accepted by the participants. The multiple choice system of interaction was reported as both useful but also restrictive. Future work should look at further developing the mode of interaction and explore whether the VP results in any changes in observed behaviour or practice.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.