Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Medical Informatics

Date Submitted: Jul 21, 2020
Date Accepted: Apr 13, 2021

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Neural Network–Based Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Profile Compensation for Glaucoma Diagnosis in Myopia: Model Development and Validation

Li L, Zhu H, Zhang Z, Zhao L, Xu L, Jonas RA, Garway-Heath DF, Jonas JB, Wang YX

Neural Network–Based Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Profile Compensation for Glaucoma Diagnosis in Myopia: Model Development and Validation

JMIR Med Inform 2021;9(5):e22664

DOI: 10.2196/22664

PMID: 34003137

PMCID: 8170554

A Neural Network Based Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Profile Compensation for Glaucoma Diagnosis in Myopia

  • Lei Li; 
  • Haogang Zhu; 
  • Zhenyu Zhang; 
  • Liang Zhao; 
  • Liang Xu; 
  • Rahul A Jonas; 
  • David F Garway-Heath; 
  • Jost B Jonas; 
  • Ya Xing Wang

ABSTRACT

Background:

It has been a clinical emphasis and challenge to detect glaucoma in highly myopic eyes. Due to the axial elongation-associated changes in the optic nerve and retina in high myopia, traditional methods like optic disc evaluation and visual field were not able to correctly differentiate the glaucomatous lesions.

Objective:

To develop a neural network for adjusting the dependence of the peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness (RNFLT) profile on age, gender and ocular biometric parameters, and to evaluate its performance in glaucoma diagnosis, especially in high myopia.

Methods:

RNFLT with 768 points at the circumferential 3.4 mm scan was measured using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT). A fully connected network and a radial basis function network were trained for vertical (scaling) and horizontal (shift) transformation of the RNFLT profile with adjustment for age, axial length (AL), disc-fovea angle and distance, in a test group of 2223 non-glaucomatous eyes. The performance of RNFLT compensation was evaluated in an independent group of 254 glaucoma patients and 254 non-glaucomatous participants.

Results:

By applying the RNFL compensation algorithm, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve in detecting glaucoma increased from 0.70 to 0.84, from 0.75 to 0.89, from 0.77 to 0.89, and from 0.78 to 0.87, for eyes in the highest 10% (mean: 26.0±0.9mm), 20% (25.3±1.0mm), and highest 30% (24.9±1.0mm) percentile subgroup of the AL distribution, and in eyes of any AL (23.5±1.2mm), in comparing with unadjusted RNFLT, respectively. The difference between uncompensated versus compensated RNFLT values increased with longer axial length, with enlargement of 19.8%, 18.9%, 16.2% and 11.3% in the highest 10%, 20% and 30% percentile subgroups, and in all eyes, respectively.

Conclusions:

In a population-based study sample, an algorithm-based adjustment for age, gender and ocular biometric parameters improved the diagnostic precision of the RNFLT profile for glaucoma detection in particular in myopic and highly myopic eyes.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Li L, Zhu H, Zhang Z, Zhao L, Xu L, Jonas RA, Garway-Heath DF, Jonas JB, Wang YX

Neural Network–Based Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Profile Compensation for Glaucoma Diagnosis in Myopia: Model Development and Validation

JMIR Med Inform 2021;9(5):e22664

DOI: 10.2196/22664

PMID: 34003137

PMCID: 8170554

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.