Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR mHealth and uHealth

Date Submitted: Jul 6, 2020
Date Accepted: Aug 18, 2020

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Clinometric Gait Analysis Using Smart Insoles in Patients With Hemiplegia After Stroke: Pilot Study

Seo M, Shin M, Park T, Park JH

Clinometric Gait Analysis Using Smart Insoles in Patients With Hemiplegia After Stroke: Pilot Study

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2020;8(9):e22208

DOI: 10.2196/22208

PMID: 32909949

PMCID: 7516684

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Clinometric gait analysis using smart insoles is correlated with Fugl-Meyer Assessment results in patients with hemiplegia after stroke: Observational study

  • Minseok Seo; 
  • MyungJun Shin; 
  • Taesung Park; 
  • Jong-Hwan Park

ABSTRACT

Background:

For effective rehabilitation after stroke, it is essential to conduct an objective assessment of the patient’s functional status. Several stroke severity scales have been used for this purpose, but such scales have various limitations.

Objective:

Gait analysis using smart insole technology can be applied continuously, objectively and quantitatively, thereby overcoming the shortcomings of other assessment tools.

Methods:

To confirm the reliability of gait analysis using smart insole technology, normal healthy controls wore insoles in their shoes during the timed up-and-go (TUG) test. The gait parameters were compared with the manually collected data. To determine the gait characteristics of patients with hemiplegia due to stroke, they were asked to wear insoles and take the TUG test: gait parameters were calculated and compared with those of control subjects. To investigate whether the gait analysis accurately reflected the patients’ clinical condition, we analyzed the relationships of 22 gait parameters on four stroke severity scales.

Results:

The smart insole gait parameter data were similar to those calculated manually. Among the 18 gait parameters tested, 14 were significantly effective at distinguishing patients from healthy controls. The smart insole data revealed that the stance duration on both sides was longer in patients than controls, which has proven difficult to show using other methods. Furthermore, the sound side in patients showed a markedly longer stance duration. Regarding swing duration, that of the sound side was shorter in patients than controls, whereas that of the hemiplegic side was longer. We identified 10 significantly correlated gait parameters on the stroke severity scales. Notably, the difference in stance duration between the sound and hemiplegic sides (%) was significantly correlated with the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) lower extremity score.

Conclusions:

This study confirmed the feasibility and applicability of the smart insole as a device to assess the gait of patients with hemiplegia due to stroke. In addition, we demonstrated that the FMA score was significantly correlated with the smart insole data. Providing an environment where stroke patients can easily measure walking ability is thought to help maintain chronic functions as well as acute rehabilitation. Clinical Trial: The Institutional Review Board of Pusan National University Hospital approved this study, which was registered retrospectively (1812-010-074).


 Citation

Please cite as:

Seo M, Shin M, Park T, Park JH

Clinometric Gait Analysis Using Smart Insoles in Patients With Hemiplegia After Stroke: Pilot Study

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2020;8(9):e22208

DOI: 10.2196/22208

PMID: 32909949

PMCID: 7516684

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.