Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR mHealth and uHealth

Date Submitted: Jun 30, 2020
Date Accepted: Dec 18, 2020

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Effectiveness of a Mobile Health and Self-Management App for High-Risk Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in Daily Clinical Practice: Mixed Methods Evaluation Study

Kooij L, Vos P, Dijkstra A, van Harten W

Effectiveness of a Mobile Health and Self-Management App for High-Risk Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in Daily Clinical Practice: Mixed Methods Evaluation Study

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2021;9(2):e21977

DOI: 10.2196/21977

PMID: 33538699

PMCID: 7892284

The effectiveness of a mobile health and self-management app for high risk COPD patients in daily clinical practice: evaluation study of a blended approach

  • Laura Kooij; 
  • P.J.E. Vos; 
  • A. Dijkstra; 
  • W.H. van Harten

ABSTRACT

Background:

Self-management interventions, supported by mobile apps, can improve COPD patients’ management over their disease and may decrease hospital admissions. However, not all patients qualify and systematic, comprehensive information on implementation- and compliance related aspects of mobile self-management apps is lacking. As there is a tendency to target digital services to patients in stable phases of disease, it is especially relevant to focus on use in broad clinical practice for patients recently discharged from hospital.

Objective:

To evaluate the effects of a mobile self-management app in clinical practice for recently discharged COPD patients on application use, self-management, anxiety and depression, technology acceptance, patients’ and health care professionals’ satisfaction and hospital readmissions.

Methods:

Usability testing with COPD patients was used to improve the application. Subsequently, patients were provided with the app, containing an 8 week self-management program including lung exacerbation action plan, education, questionnaires, and video consultation. Adult patients, with doctor-diagnosed COPD, access to a mobile device and proficiency of the Dutch language were included during hospital admission. Questionnaires were completed at baseline, after 8 and 20 weeks on self-management (Partners in Health Scale), technology acceptance (UTAUT model) and patients’ and nurses’ satisfaction. Use was assessed using log data, and readmission rates were extracted from the EMR.

Results:

Overall, 76% of patients had to be excluded from participation; half of those because of lack of digital skills and/or access to a mobile device. The COPD app was opened an average of 3.4 (SD2.6) times per week, but use decreased over time. Patients read the information most often during the first week, especially on relevant COPD aspects (74%) and physical activity (62%). The self-management element ‘knowledge and coping’ increased significantly over time (P=.04). However, no effects on anxiety and depression were found. Patients rated the COPD app with a 7.7 (1.7) and were positive about the information. Nurses rated the application with a 6.3 (1.2), and expressed concerns about workload. Preliminary evidence about readmissions rate showed that 13% of patients was readmitted within 30 days, and 21% within 8 weeks, compared to respectively 14% and 22 % in a pre/research cohort.

Conclusions:

The use of a mobile self-management app after hospital discharge seems only feasible for small number of COPD patients. Patients were satisfied about the service, but use decreased over time and a significant relation with use was only found with knowledge and coping. Health care professionals expressed concerns about increased workload. Tailored interventions, patient support and active adoption by professionals are important elements to ensure successful mHealth interventions. Therefore, future research on digital self-management interventions in clinical practice should focus on including more difficult subgroups of target populations, on a multidisciplinary approach, technology related aspects (such as acceptability) and finetuning its adoption in clinical pathways.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Kooij L, Vos P, Dijkstra A, van Harten W

Effectiveness of a Mobile Health and Self-Management App for High-Risk Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in Daily Clinical Practice: Mixed Methods Evaluation Study

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2021;9(2):e21977

DOI: 10.2196/21977

PMID: 33538699

PMCID: 7892284

The author of this paper has made a PDF available, but requires the user to login, or create an account.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.