Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR mHealth and uHealth

Date Submitted: Jun 29, 2020
Date Accepted: Jul 22, 2020
Date Submitted to PubMed: Sep 8, 2020

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Communication Technology Preferences of Hospitalized and Institutionalized Frail Older Adults During COVID-19 Confinement: Cross-Sectional Survey Study

Sacco G, LLÉONART S, Simon R, Noublanche F, Annweiler C, TOVID-49 Study Group

Communication Technology Preferences of Hospitalized and Institutionalized Frail Older Adults During COVID-19 Confinement: Cross-Sectional Survey Study

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2020;8(9):e21845

DOI: 10.2196/21845

PMID: 32896832

PMCID: 7518882

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Which communication modality is favored by frail older adults during confinement? The TOVID-49 study

  • Guillaume Sacco; 
  • Sébastien LLÉONART; 
  • Romain Simon; 
  • Frédéric Noublanche; 
  • Cédric Annweiler; 
  • TOVID-49 Study Group

ABSTRACT

Background:

Technological communication supports such as phone-calls or video-calls could help prevent social isolation and loneliness in frail older adults during confinement.

Objective:

Our objectives were to determine i) which virtual communication modality (i.e. phone-call versus video-call) was preferred by confined older patients and residents, and ii) the variables influencing this choice.

Methods:

Cross-sectional study examining the preference between phone-calls and video-calls among frail older adults either hospitalized in a geriatric acute care unit (GACU) or institutionalized in a long-term care and nursing-home (LTC/NH) during COVID-19 confinement.

Results:

A total of 132 seniors were included between March 25 and May 11, 2020 (mean±SD, 88.2±6.2 years; 59% women). Patients hospitalized in GACU were more often independent to establish communication than residents institutionalized in LTC/NH (P=0.026) and were more satisfied (P=0.019). Overall, seniors tended to favor phone-calls over video-calls (55% versus 45%), but their satisfaction degree was similar regardless of the device chosen (P=0.10), with no effect of age (P=0.97) or gender (P=0.16). In GACU, the satisfaction degree was similar between phone-calls and video-calls in older patients (98% versus 87%, P=0.10). Conversely, in LTC/NH, residents were more satisfied with the use of video-calls to communicate with their relatives (93% versus 50%, P=0.024).

Conclusions:

Seniors confined to healthcare settings were more independent with phone-calls than with video-calls, and tended to use the telephone more often. Their satisfaction with video-calls was however important when they were helped to establish communication.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Sacco G, LLÉONART S, Simon R, Noublanche F, Annweiler C, TOVID-49 Study Group

Communication Technology Preferences of Hospitalized and Institutionalized Frail Older Adults During COVID-19 Confinement: Cross-Sectional Survey Study

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2020;8(9):e21845

DOI: 10.2196/21845

PMID: 32896832

PMCID: 7518882

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.