Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Research Protocols
Date Submitted: Jun 26, 2020
Date Accepted: Sep 29, 2020
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Methodological challenges in investigating supracondylar fractures of the humerus from a child’s viewpoint: evolution of study protocol
ABSTRACT
Outdoor play and risk-taking behaviours, including play at heights, are important to children’s physical, social and cognitive development (14–18). These aspects of play are important to consider when informing prevention policies for serious injuries that commonly occur on play structures. Supracondylar fractures of the humerus (SCH) are the most common type of elbow fractures that result from falls on an outstretched hand among healthy children (1,2). Despite being one of the leading causes of admission to hospital and surgical intervention (6–9), the details surrounding the cause of these injuries are often not recorded. Previous research has correlated decreased overall playground safety with higher rates of SCH fractures (11). Play structure height, as well as the type of undersurface have been identified as potential risk factors for severe injuries, including SCH fractures, in part due to their low compliance with safety standards (10,12). To inform evidence-based injury prevention policies that take into consideration the aspects of play most important to a child’s development, more research on SCH fractures is needed to gain a better understanding of the specific mechanisms and child-related factors surrounding injuries. To explore the link between the severity of SCH fractures and children’s behavioural, environmental, and mechanistic factors, we conducted a mixed method study. We used qualitative interviews with children combined with the use of visual aids, such as photographs, and quantitative analysis of playground structures comparing them to the safety standards (22–25). This combination of methods has been shown to assist children who have experienced elbow fractures in sharing their viewpoints in a clinical setting (26).Through purposeful integration of children’s perspectives and child-friendly methodologies into research, relevant factors pertaining to the injury may be identified that are often overshadowed in routine, adult-focused elicitation (23,26,29). This paper explores the challenges we encountered, the resulting insights and methodological modifications we made. We will discuss the challenges related specifically to clinical research in pediatrics and the strategies developed to conduct a study that prioritizes the engagement and perspective of children and their families.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.