Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Research Protocols
Date Submitted: Jul 2, 2020
Date Accepted: Dec 8, 2020
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Shared cancer follow-up care between general practitioners and radiation oncologists – a mixed-methods implementation study protocol
ABSTRACT
Background:
The rising incidence of cancer and increasing number of cancer survivors has resulted in the need to find alternative models of care for cancer follow-up care. The acceptability for follow-up care in general practice is growing, and acceptance increases with shared-care models where oncologists are still overseeing care. However, a major barrier to this model is the effective exchange of information in real-time between oncologists and general practitioners. Improved communication technology plays an important role in the acceptability and feasibility of cancer shared follow-up care.
Objective:
The aim to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of a shared follow-up model of care between radiation oncologists and general practitioners.
Methods:
This study is a mixed-method multisite implementation study exploring shared follow-up care for breast, colorectal and prostate cancer patients treated with curative radiotherapy. This study uses digital health to support a general practitioner performing some aspects of the routine radiotherapy follow-up care, whilst being overseen by a radiation oncologist in real-time. The study has two phases: 1. to establish the level of agreement between general practitioners and radiation oncologists, and 2. to implement shared follow-up care into practice and evaluate it.
Results:
-
Conclusions:
Few studies have investigated the role of health technologies in supporting communication deficiencies for shared-care cancer follow-up care. The implementation and evaluation, of models of care, need to be conducted with a person-centred approach, that is responsive to patients preferences and needs. Should the findings of the study be acceptable and feasible to radiation oncologists, general practitioners and patients, it can be quickly implemented and expanded to other tumour groups, or medical oncology and haematology. Clinical Trial: submitted - pending
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.