Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Dermatology

Date Submitted: Jun 17, 2020
Date Accepted: Apr 17, 2021
Date Submitted to PubMed: Aug 25, 2023

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Patient Factors Associated with Interest in Teledermatology: Cross-sectional Survey

Ghani M, Adler C, Yeung H

Patient Factors Associated with Interest in Teledermatology: Cross-sectional Survey

JMIR Dermatol 2021;4(1):e21555

DOI: 10.2196/21555

PMID: 37625162

PMCID: 10501513

Patient Factors Associated with Interest in Teledermatology: A Cross-Sectional Survey

  • Maham Ghani; 
  • Colin Adler; 
  • Howa Yeung

ABSTRACT

Background:

Teledermatology holds the promise to address access needs for dermatologic care; however, interest in using teledermatology is unknown in underserved populations with potential barriers to healthcare technology use.

Objective:

This study aimed to characterize the association between demographic characteristics with interest in exchanging digital images or videos of skin lesions with healthcare providers electronically.

Methods:

We examined data from the National Cancer Institute Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS) 4 Cycle 4 from 2014. HINTS is a cross-sectional, nationally representative household survey conducted annually, which collects information on demographics, perceptions and use of health information, and provides information about how cancer risks are perceived. HINTS 4 Cycle 4 had a sample of 3,677. We examined the outcome: “How interested are you in exchanging digital images/video (e.g., photos of skin lesions) with a health care provider electronically?” We dichotomized the outcome by high level of interest (“very”), as compared to those who did not have a high level of interest in exchanging (“somewhat”, “a little”, or “not at all”). Analyses were conducted using SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). We conducted a multivariable logistic regression model developed using backwards selection, with all final covariates associated with varying levels of teledermatology use at P < 0.05. Sensitivity analysis was also performed by changing the outcome dichotomy to model those who were “not at all” interested. Two-sided tests with P <0.05 were considered significant.

Results:

Among 3,447 respondents, 888 were “very” interested in participating in teledermatology (weighted prevalence, 26.2%). Higher interest in using teledermatology was associated with younger age group, higher educational attainment, higher household income, any internet use, type of mobile device ownership, history of electronic medical information exchange with clinician within the past 12 months, and high level of trust in internet cancer information (each P < 0.01); but not with female gender, race/ethnicity, health insurance status, or having a regular medical provider.

Conclusions:

Modifiable access barriers to teledermatology adoption include trust, experience with teledermatology and use of health apps. Teledermatology program implementation should address these specific factors within the digital divide to promote equitable access to care across diverse patient populations.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Ghani M, Adler C, Yeung H

Patient Factors Associated with Interest in Teledermatology: Cross-sectional Survey

JMIR Dermatol 2021;4(1):e21555

DOI: 10.2196/21555

PMID: 37625162

PMCID: 10501513

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.