Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Diabetes

Date Submitted: Jun 19, 2020
Date Accepted: Oct 26, 2020

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Continuous Glucose Monitoring With Low-Carbohydrate Diet Coaching in Adults With Prediabetes: Mixed Methods Pilot Study

Yost O, DeJonckheere M, Stonebraker S, Ling G, Buis L, Pop-Busui R, Kim N, Mizokami-Stout K, Richardson C

Continuous Glucose Monitoring With Low-Carbohydrate Diet Coaching in Adults With Prediabetes: Mixed Methods Pilot Study

JMIR Diabetes 2020;5(4):e21551

DOI: 10.2196/21551

PMID: 33325831

PMCID: 7773517

Continuous Glucose Monitoring with Low-Carbohydrate Diet Coaching in Adults with Prediabetes: Mixed Methods Pilot Study

  • Olivia Yost; 
  • Melissa DeJonckheere; 
  • Spring Stonebraker; 
  • Grace Ling; 
  • Lorraine Buis; 
  • Rodica Pop-Busui; 
  • Noa Kim; 
  • Kara Mizokami-Stout; 
  • Caroline Richardson

ABSTRACT

Background:

Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) is preventable, yet few patients with prediabetes participate in prevention programs. Use of user-friendly continuous glucose monitors (CGM) with low-carbohydrate diet coaching is a novel strategy to prevent T2DM.

Objective:

The objective of this study was to determine patient satisfaction and feasibility of an intervention pairing CGM use and low-carbohydrate diet coaching in patients with prediabetes to drive dietary behavior change.

Methods:

We conducted a mixed methods single arm pilot and feasibility study at a suburban family medicine clinic. Fifteen adults with prediabetes, defined as hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) between 5.7 and 6.4, and BMI > 30 kg/m2 were recruited to participate. The intervention and assessments took place during three in-person study visits and two qualitative phone interviews (post-intervention and 6-months post-intervention). At Visit 1, participants were asked to wear a continuous glucose monitor (CGM) and complete a food and craving log for ten days. At Visit 2, they reviewed their food and craving log with CGM results and received low-carbohydrate diet coaching, including learning about carbohydrates and personalized feedback. A second CGM sensor, with the ability to scan and see glucose trends, was placed and participants logged food and cravings as they tried to reduce their total carbohydrate intake (<100 g/day). At Visit 3, participants reviewed their CGM and log data. Primary outcome was satisfaction with use of CGM and low carbohydrate diet. Secondary outcomes included feasibility, weight and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) change, and percent time in hyperglycemia. Changes in attitudes and risk perception of developing diabetes were also assessed.

Results:

There overall satisfaction rate with intervention was a 93% satisfaction. The intervention induced a reduction in weight of 1.4 lb ( p=0.02) and in HbA1c of 0.71 mmol/mol, p < .001 from enrollment. Though not significant, percent time above glucose goal and average daily glucose decreased during the study period. Qualitative interview themes indicated: 1) no major barriers to CGM use; 2) acceptance of low carbohydrate diet; 3) CGM helped to visualize the impact of carbohydrates on the body, inciting dietary changes.

Conclusions:

Use of CGMs and low-carbohydrate diet coaching to drive dietary change in patients with prediabetes is feasible and acceptable to patients. This novel method deserves further exploration as preliminary data indicates CGM with low-carbohydrate diet coaching supported dietary change, which may ultimately prevent T2DM.   Clinical Trial: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03695913


 Citation

Please cite as:

Yost O, DeJonckheere M, Stonebraker S, Ling G, Buis L, Pop-Busui R, Kim N, Mizokami-Stout K, Richardson C

Continuous Glucose Monitoring With Low-Carbohydrate Diet Coaching in Adults With Prediabetes: Mixed Methods Pilot Study

JMIR Diabetes 2020;5(4):e21551

DOI: 10.2196/21551

PMID: 33325831

PMCID: 7773517

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.