Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Research Protocols

Date Submitted: Jun 26, 2020
Date Accepted: Nov 3, 2020

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Risk Perception of Health Professionals in Intrapartum Care Decisions: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study

Peterwerth NH, Halek M, Tulka S, Schäfers R

Risk Perception of Health Professionals in Intrapartum Care Decisions: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study

JMIR Res Protoc 2020;9(11):e21443

DOI: 10.2196/21443

PMID: 33226353

PMCID: 7721551

Risk Perception of Health Professionals in Intrapartum Care Decisions: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study

  • Nina H. Peterwerth; 
  • Margareta Halek; 
  • Sabrina Tulka; 
  • Rainhild Schäfers

ABSTRACT

Background:

Risk perception plays an important role in decision-making processes. Differences in obstetric intervention rates suggest that, in addition to medical indications, the risk perception of obstetric health professionals might have a major influence on their decision-making process during childbirth. Although studies have investigated whether risk perception affects the role of midwifery or influences decision-making during childbirth, little is known about what obstetric health professionals actually perceive as risk or risky situations and whether different risk perceptions lead to more interventions during intrapartum care.

Objective:

The objective of this study is to understand the association of risk perception and the decision-making processes of obstetric health professionals (midwives and obstetricians) in Germany during intrapartum care. The study has 3 specific aims: (i) gain insight into what obstetric health professionals perceive as risk in the German clinical setting, (ii) assess the extent to which personal and systemic factors have an impact on obstetric health professionals’ risk perception, and (iii) investigate whether different perceptions of risk are associated with different decisions being made by obstetric health professionals.

Methods:

This is an exploratory sequential mixed methods study with two phases: a qualitative followed by a quantitative phase. In the first phase, qualitative data is collected and analyzed by conducting focus group discussions and applying qualitative content analysis to address aim (i). In the second phase, for aims (ii) & (iii) and to help explain the qualitative results, quantitative data are collected and analyzed by conducting an observational study using case vignettes within a survey constructed on the basis of the qualitative results.

Results:

Enrolment in the first (qualitative) phase began in July 2019 and data collection and analysis has been completed. The second (quantitative) phase is currently planned. First results are expected to be submitted for publication in 2020, with completion scheduled for 2021.

Conclusions:

This mixed methods study will examine the perception of risk and its association with the decision-making processes of obstetric health professionals during their care of women in childbirth. The rationale for this approach is that the qualitative data and their analysis explore participant’s views in more depth while the quantitative data will help to provide and explore a general understanding of the research problem. The results are expected to be relevant to health care professionals, policymakers and educational institutions in order to minimize underuse, overuse and misuse of interventions during intrapartDRKS00017172um care. Clinical Trial: DRKS00017172


 Citation

Please cite as:

Peterwerth NH, Halek M, Tulka S, Schäfers R

Risk Perception of Health Professionals in Intrapartum Care Decisions: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study

JMIR Res Protoc 2020;9(11):e21443

DOI: 10.2196/21443

PMID: 33226353

PMCID: 7721551

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.