Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Jun 13, 2020
Date Accepted: Dec 12, 2020
Date Submitted to PubMed: Jan 6, 2021

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Retracted: "Assessing the Dissemination of COVID-19 Articles Across Social Media With Altmetric and PlumX Metrics: Correlational Study"

Tornberg HN, Moezinia C, Wei C, Bernstein SA, Wei C, Al-Beyati R, Quan T, Diemert DJ

Retracted: "Assessing the Dissemination of COVID-19 Articles Across Social Media With Altmetric and PlumX Metrics: Correlational Study"

J Med Internet Res 2021;23(1):e21408

DOI: 10.2196/21408

PMID: 33406049

PMCID: 7813558

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Assessment of the dissemination of COVID-19 articles across social media- An Altmetrics and PlumX Study

  • Haley N. Tornberg; 
  • Carine Moezinia; 
  • Chapman Wei; 
  • Simone A. Bernstein; 
  • Chaplin Wei; 
  • Refka Al-Beyati; 
  • Theodore Quan; 
  • David J. Diemert

ABSTRACT

Background:

The use of social media assists in the distribution of information about COVID-19 to the general public and health professionals. Alternative-level metrics (Altmetrics) and PlumX metrics are new methods that can assess the amount of sharing and spreading of a scientific article in social media platforms.

Objective:

Our objective was to characterize the traditional metrics (citation-count) and new metrics of the top 100 Altmetric scored COVID-19 articles.

Methods:

100 highest Altmetric Attention Score (AAS) articles were identified utilizing the Altmetric explorer in May 2020. AAS, journal name, and mentions from various social media databases of each article were collected. Citation-counts and PlumX Weighted Citation Impact scores were collected from the Scopus database. Additionally, AAS, PlumX scores, and citation-counts were log-transformed and adjusted by +1 for linear regression, and Spearman correlation coefficients were utilized to determine correlations.

Results:

The median AAS, PlumX score, and citation-count were 4922.50, 37.92, and 24.00, respectively. Of 100 articles, New England Journal of Medicine published the most articles. Twitter was the most frequently used social media platform. Positive correlations were seen between AAS and citation-count (R2=0.0973; P=0.002, and PlumX score and citation-count (R2=0.8911; P<0.001).

Conclusions:

Our research demonstrates that citation-count is weakly correlated with AAS, but strongly correlated with PlumX scores regarding COVID-19 articles at this point in time. Altmetrics and PlumX metrics should utilized in complement with traditional citation-count when assessing the dissemination and impact of an article regarding COVID-19.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Tornberg HN, Moezinia C, Wei C, Bernstein SA, Wei C, Al-Beyati R, Quan T, Diemert DJ

Retracted: "Assessing the Dissemination of COVID-19 Articles Across Social Media With Altmetric and PlumX Metrics: Correlational Study"

J Med Internet Res 2021;23(1):e21408

DOI: 10.2196/21408

PMID: 33406049

PMCID: 7813558

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.