Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies

Date Submitted: Aug 21, 2020
Date Accepted: Dec 12, 2020

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Adherence Patterns and Dose Response of Physiotherapy for Rotator Cuff Pathology: Longitudinal Cohort Study

Burns D, Boyer P, Razmjou H, Richards R, Whyne C

Adherence Patterns and Dose Response of Physiotherapy for Rotator Cuff Pathology: Longitudinal Cohort Study

JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol 2021;8(1):e21374

DOI: 10.2196/21374

PMID: 33704076

PMCID: 8082948

Adherence Patterns and Dose Response of Physiotherapy For Rotator Cuff Pathology: A Longitudinal Cohort Study

  • David Burns; 
  • Philip Boyer; 
  • Helen Razmjou; 
  • Robin Richards; 
  • Cari Whyne

ABSTRACT

Background:

Physiotherapy is considered essential for the successful operative and non-operative management of rotator cuff pathology. However, the extent to which patients adhere to assigned physiotherapy activities and how this impacts recovery is unknown.

Objective:

The purpose of this study is to measure the rate and patterns of participation in physiotherapy for rotator cuff disorders, assess the dose-response between physiotherapy activity and recovery, and to explore patient factors predictive of physiotherapy participation.

Methods:

We report a prospective longitudinal study of 42 patients undergoing physiotherapy for symptomatic rotator cuff pathology. The patients were issued a smart watch that recorded 9-axis inertial sensor data while they performed physiotherapy exercises both in the clinic and in the home setting. A machine learning approach was used to assess total physiotherapy participation from the smart watch inertial data. Primary outcomes were the Disabilities of the Arm Shoulder and Hand (DASH) and Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) assessed every 4 weeks until 12 weeks follow-up. The relationship between participation, outcomes, and clinical patient variables were assessed in univariable analyses.

Results:

Mean physiotherapy exercise participation in clinic and at home were 11 and 33 minutes per week respectively, with patients participating in physiotherapy on 41% of days assigned to treatment. Home physiotherapy participation decreased significantly over time (P = 0.03). There was a statistically significant and clinically meaningful relationship between cumulative physiotherapy participation and recovery in pain and disability scores at 8 weeks and 12 weeks follow-up (P < 0.05). Low patient expectations and self-efficacy were associated with low rates of physiotherapy participation.

Conclusions:

There was a low rate of participation in home shoulder physiotherapy exercise, and a statistically and clinically significant dose-response of physiotherapy on treatment outcome in patients with rotator cuff pathology. The findings highlight the opportunity to develop novel methods and strategies to improve the participation in and efficacy of physiotherapy exercises for rotator cuff disorders.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Burns D, Boyer P, Razmjou H, Richards R, Whyne C

Adherence Patterns and Dose Response of Physiotherapy for Rotator Cuff Pathology: Longitudinal Cohort Study

JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol 2021;8(1):e21374

DOI: 10.2196/21374

PMID: 33704076

PMCID: 8082948

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.