Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Jun 8, 2020
Date Accepted: Jul 14, 2020

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Health Technology Readiness Profiles Among Danish Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes: Cross-Sectional Study

Thorsen IK, Rossen S, Glümer C, Midtgaard J, Ried-Larsen M, Kayser L

Health Technology Readiness Profiles Among Danish Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes: Cross-Sectional Study

J Med Internet Res 2020;22(9):e21195

DOI: 10.2196/21195

PMID: 32930669

PMCID: 7525399

Health technology readiness profiles among Danish individuals with type 2 diabetes: a cross-sectional study

  • Ida Kær Thorsen; 
  • Sine Rossen; 
  • Charlotte Glümer; 
  • Julie Midtgaard; 
  • Mathias Ried-Larsen; 
  • Lars Kayser

ABSTRACT

Background:

Information technologies (IT) are increasingly implemented in type 2 diabetes (T2D) treatment as a resource for remotely supported healthcare. However, the effectiveness of information technologies (IT) to improve healthcare may depend on the user’s readiness for health technology.

Objective:

We aimed to investigate readiness for health technology in relation to mental well-being, sociodemographic and disease-related characteristics among individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2D).

Methods:

Individuals with T2D (age ≥18 years) referred to a lifestyle program completed a questionnaire survey covering: (1) background information, (2) the WHO-5 Well-Being Index, (3) receptiveness to IT use in physical activity; and (4) the Readiness and Enablement Index for Health Technology (READHY), constituted by dimensions related to self-management, social support, and eHealth literacy. Individuals were divided into profiles using cluster analysis based on their READHY scores. Outcomes included differences across profiles in mental well-being, sociodemographic and disease-related characteristics.

Results:

Individuals with T2D (n=155; age (mean (SD)), 60.2 (10.7) years; sex, 55.5% men) were stratified into five readiness for health technology profiles based on the cluster analysis. While no differences in sociodemographic and disease-related characteristics were observed across profiles, we identified three vulnerable subgroups of individuals: Profile 3 (n=21, 13.5%), younger age (53.4 (8.9) years), low mental well-being (42.7 (14.7)), and emotional distress (1.69 (0.38)); Profile 4 (n=20, 12.9%), older age (66.3 (9.0) years), less IT use (50.0% used IT for communication), and low to medium eHealth literacy; and Profile 5 (n=36, 23.2%), low mental well-being (43.4 (20.1)) and low readiness for health technology.

Conclusions:

Implementation of IT in healthcare of individuals with T2D should be based on comprehensive consideration of mental well-being, emotional distress, and readiness for health technology rather than sociodemographic and disease-related characteristics to identify the individuals in need for social support, self-management education, and extensive IT support. A one-size fits all approach to IT implementation in healthcare will potentially increase the risk of treatment failure among the most vulnerable individuals.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Thorsen IK, Rossen S, Glümer C, Midtgaard J, Ried-Larsen M, Kayser L

Health Technology Readiness Profiles Among Danish Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes: Cross-Sectional Study

J Med Internet Res 2020;22(9):e21195

DOI: 10.2196/21195

PMID: 32930669

PMCID: 7525399

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.