Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting

Date Submitted: Jun 3, 2020
Date Accepted: Aug 6, 2020

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Repeated Psychosocial Screening of High School Students Using YouthCHAT: Cohort Study

Thabrew H, Kumar H, Goldfinch M, Cavadino A, Goodyear-Smith F

Repeated Psychosocial Screening of High School Students Using YouthCHAT: Cohort Study

JMIR Pediatr Parent 2020;3(2):e20976

DOI: 10.2196/20976

PMID: 33104007

PMCID: 7652683

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Repeated psychosocial screening of high school students using YouthCHAT: a cohort study

  • Hiran Thabrew; 
  • Harshali Kumar; 
  • Mary Goldfinch; 
  • Alana Cavadino; 
  • Felicity Goodyear-Smith

ABSTRACT

Background:

Psychosocial problems are common during adolescence and can have long-lasting effects on health, academic and social functioning. YouthCHAT, an electronic, HEEADSSS-aligned instrument, has recently been demonstrated to be an acceptable and effective school-based psychosocial screener for 13-year old (Year 9) high school students.

Objective:

This study aimed to compare acceptability and detection rates with repeated YouthCHAT screening of high school students when they were aged 13-years (Year 9) and 14-years (Year 10).

Objective:

This study aimed to compare acceptability and detection rates with repeated YouthCHAT screening of high school students when they were aged 13-years (Year 9) and 14-years (Year 10).

Methods:

We invited all Year 10 students to complete YouthCHAT screening in 2018. Rates of positively identified issues were compared between the subset of students screened in both 2017 and 2018. Follow-up rates in 2018 were also investigated to explore the potential referral burden following screening.

Results:

Of 141 eligible Year 10 students, 114 (81%) completed YouthCHAT screening during 2018 and 97 of them (85%) completed it for the second time. Apart from depression which increased, and perceived life stress which decreased, rates of identified issues were broadly similar between 13 and 14-years of age. Repeated screening via YouthCHAT was acceptable to students and time-efficient (mean 6 minutes and 32 seconds) but did not reduce the overall number of individuals with identified issues. Follow-up from positive screens were mostly managed by school-based health services without need for external referral.

Conclusions:

Although further evaluation is needed, our results support the value of YouthCHAT as an acceptable and effective instrument with which to achieve routine identification of psychosocial issues and early intervention within a high school environment. Clinical Trial: The study was registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) ACTRN12616001243404p and was approved by the New Zealand Northern Region Ethics Committee (16/CEN/137/AM03).


 Citation

Please cite as:

Thabrew H, Kumar H, Goldfinch M, Cavadino A, Goodyear-Smith F

Repeated Psychosocial Screening of High School Students Using YouthCHAT: Cohort Study

JMIR Pediatr Parent 2020;3(2):e20976

DOI: 10.2196/20976

PMID: 33104007

PMCID: 7652683

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.