Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Research Protocols

Date Submitted: May 29, 2020
Date Accepted: Aug 6, 2020
Date Submitted to PubMed: Aug 9, 2020

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Remote Assessment of Functional Mobility and Strength in Older Cancer Survivors: Protocol for a Validity and Reliability Study

Blair C, Harding E, Herman C, Boyce T, Demark-Wahnefried W, Davis S, Kinney A, Pankratz V

Remote Assessment of Functional Mobility and Strength in Older Cancer Survivors: Protocol for a Validity and Reliability Study

JMIR Res Protoc 2020;9(9):e20834

DOI: 10.2196/20834

PMID: 32769075

PMCID: 7492978

Remote Assessment of Functional Mobility and Strength in Older Cancer Survivors: Protocol for a Validity and Reliability Study

  • Cindy Blair; 
  • Elizabeth Harding; 
  • Carla Herman; 
  • Tawny Boyce; 
  • Wendy Demark-Wahnefried; 
  • Sally Davis; 
  • Anita Kinney; 
  • Vernon Pankratz

ABSTRACT

Background:

Physical performance is an important predictor of disability, quality of life, and premature mortality, and thus is considered an important target of interventions designed to prevent, delay, or attenuate physical functional decline. Currently, low-cost, valid, reliable, and easy to use methods to remotely assess physical performance in older adults do not exist, limiting the reach, scalability, and dissemination of interventions.

Objective:

To describe the rationale and design for a study to evaluate the accuracy, reliability, safety, and acceptability of videoconferencing and self-administered physical performance testing by older adults in their own homes.

Methods:

To enable remote assessment, participants receive a toolkit and instructions for setting up their test course and communicating with the investigator. The study consists of several phases. Phase 1 evaluates proof-of-concept that older adults (age ≥60 years) can follow the testing protocol and use a tablet PC to communicate with the study investigator. Phase 2 evaluates the validity of videoconference vs. face-to-face assessment of physical performance tests. Phase 3 evaluates reliability by enrolling 5-10 participants who agree to repeat the remote assessment (without the face-to-face assessment). Phase 4 enrolls 5-10 new study participants to complete the remote assessment test protocol. Feedback from participants in each phase is used to refine the test protocol and instructions.

Results:

Enrollment began in December 2019. Ten participants completed the proof-of-concept phase (Phase 1). The study was paused in mid-March 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The study is expected to be completed by the end of 2020.

Conclusions:

This validity and reliability study will provide important information on the acceptability and safety of using videoconferencing to remotely assess physical performance tests, self-administered by older adults in their homes. Videoconferencing has the potential to expand the reach, scalability, and dissemination of interventions, especially to rural areas. Clinical Trial: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04339959; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04339959?term=NCT04339959


 Citation

Please cite as:

Blair C, Harding E, Herman C, Boyce T, Demark-Wahnefried W, Davis S, Kinney A, Pankratz V

Remote Assessment of Functional Mobility and Strength in Older Cancer Survivors: Protocol for a Validity and Reliability Study

JMIR Res Protoc 2020;9(9):e20834

DOI: 10.2196/20834

PMID: 32769075

PMCID: 7492978

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.