Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR mHealth and uHealth

Date Submitted: May 20, 2020
Date Accepted: Sep 3, 2020

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Use of mHealth Devices to Screen for Atrial Fibrillation: Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

Giebel GD

Use of mHealth Devices to Screen for Atrial Fibrillation: Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2020;8(10):e20496

DOI: 10.2196/20496

PMID: 33021489

PMCID: 7576464

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Cost-Effectiveness of mHealth Devices to Screen for Atrial Fibrillation: health economic assessment

  • Godwin Denk Giebel

ABSTRACT

Background:

With an estimated prevalence of around 3% and an about 2.5-fold increased risk of stroke, Atrial Fibrillation (AF) is a serious threat for patients and a high economic burden for health care systems all over the world. Patients suffering from AF could benefit from screening through mobile health (mHealth) devices. Thus, an early diagnosis is possible and the risk for stroke can be markedly reduced by using anticoagulation.

Objective:

The aim of this work is to assess the cost-effectiveness of screening for AF with aid of mHealth devices. Even if prevented strokes and prevented deaths from stroke are the most relevant patient outcomes, direct costs were defined as the primary outcome.

Methods:

A Monte Carlo simulation was conducted based on a developed state-transition model. 30,000 patients for each CHA2DS2-VASc score from 1 to 9 were simulated. The first simulation served to estimate the economic burden of AF without the use of mHealth devices. The second, to simulate the economic burden of AF with the use of mHealth devices. Afterwards, the groups were compared in terms of costs, prevented strokes and deaths from strokes.

Results:

The CHA2DS2-VASc score as well as the ECG confirmation rate both had an impact on costs as well as number of strokes. The higher the risk score, the lower were costs per prevented stroke. Higher ECG confirmation rates intensified this effect. The effect was not seen in groups with lower risk scores. The number of prevented strokes tended to be higher in groups with high risk for stroke. Higher ECG confirmation rate led to higher numbers of prevented strokes.

Conclusions:

The use of mHealth devices to screen for AF leads to increasing costs but also to a reduction of stroke. Especially in patients with a higher CHA2DS2-VASc score the risk for stroke and death from stroke can be markedly reduced.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Giebel GD

Use of mHealth Devices to Screen for Atrial Fibrillation: Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2020;8(10):e20496

DOI: 10.2196/20496

PMID: 33021489

PMCID: 7576464

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.