Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: May 10, 2020
Date Accepted: Oct 31, 2020
Date Submitted to PubMed: Nov 5, 2020

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Impact of Trump's Promotion of Unproven COVID-19 Treatments and Subsequent Internet Trends: Observational Study

Niburski K, Niburski O

Impact of Trump's Promotion of Unproven COVID-19 Treatments and Subsequent Internet Trends: Observational Study

J Med Internet Res 2020;22(11):e20044

DOI: 10.2196/20044

PMID: 33151895

PMCID: 7685699

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

The media landscape of unverified COVID-19 treatments: An investigation of influence

  • Kacper Niburski; 
  • Oskar Niburski

ABSTRACT

Background:

Individuals with large followings can influence public opinion and behaviours, especially during a pandemic. Recently, Donald Trump (DT) endorsed the use of unproven therapies, with a death attributed to the wrongful ingestion of a chloroquine-containing compound.

Objective:

We investigated his speeches, his twitter, Google searches and purchases, Amazon purchases, and TV airtime for hydroxychloroquine, chloroquine, azithromycin, and remdesivir.

Methods:

Twitter sourcing was catalogued with Factba.se, and analytics, both past and present, was analyzed with TweetBinder to assess average analytics of key metrics. Time spent discussing the unverified treatments on America’s five largest TV stations was catalogued with The Global Database of Events, Language, and Tone, and his speech transcripts were assessed from White House briefings. Google searching and shopping trends was analyzed with google trends. Amazon purchases were assessed Helium 10.

Results:

Over March 1st to April 30th, DT tweeted 11 times unproven therapies, mentioning them 65 times in White House briefings, especially touting hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine. These tweets were 300% above his statistical average impression. Following them, at least 2% of airtime on conservative networks, and continuous mentioning of treatment modalities like azithromycin, was seen on stations like Fox News. Google searches and purchases increased following his first mentions on March 19th, and again with his tweeting on March 21st. The same is true for all medications on Amazon, with purchases like hydroxychloroquine increasing by 200%.

Conclusions:

Individuals in position of power can sway public purchasing, resulting in undesired effects when the claims are unverified. Public health officials must work to dissuade unproven treatments for COVID-19. Clinical Trial: Not applicable


 Citation

Please cite as:

Niburski K, Niburski O

Impact of Trump's Promotion of Unproven COVID-19 Treatments and Subsequent Internet Trends: Observational Study

J Med Internet Res 2020;22(11):e20044

DOI: 10.2196/20044

PMID: 33151895

PMCID: 7685699

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.