Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: May 9, 2020
Date Accepted: Feb 25, 2021

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Internet-Specific Epistemic Beliefs in Medicine and Intention to Use Evidence-Based Online Medical Databases Among Health Care Professionals: Cross-sectional Survey

Chiu YL, Lee YC, Tsai CC

Internet-Specific Epistemic Beliefs in Medicine and Intention to Use Evidence-Based Online Medical Databases Among Health Care Professionals: Cross-sectional Survey

J Med Internet Res 2021;23(3):e20030

DOI: 10.2196/20030

PMID: 33734092

PMCID: 8074852

Healthcare professionals’ internet-specific epistemic beliefs in medicine and intention to use online evidence-based medical databases: a cross-sectional survey

  • Yen-Lin Chiu; 
  • Yu-Chen Lee; 
  • Chin-Chung Tsai

ABSTRACT

Background:

Evidence-based medicine (EBM) has been regarded as a prerequisite for healthcare quality. The increase in healthcare providers’ adoption of online medical information and the lack of awareness of alternative access to online evidence-based resources suggest an investigation on their information searching behaviors through the online evidence-based medical databases.

Objective:

he main purposes of this study were to (1) modify and validate the internet-specific epistemic beliefs in medicine (ISEBM) questionnaire and (2) explore the associations between healthcare professionals’ demographics, ISEBM and intention to use online evidence-based medical databases for clinical practice.

Methods:

The healthcare professionals in a university-affiliated teaching hospital were surveyed with the ISEBM questionnaire. The confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted to analyze the validity of the ISEBM questionnaire. Furthermore, the Structural equation modeling (SEM) with structural relationship analysis was implemented to examine the possible linkages between health professionals’ demographics, internet-specific epistemic beliefs in medicine and intention to utilize the online evidence-based medical databases for clinical practice.

Results:

A total of 277 healthcare professionals with clinical working experience were surveyed. The results of CFA indicated all items had significant loadings ranging from 0.69 to 0.89 with satisfactory composite reliability (CR) values ranging from 0.70 to 0.89. The results of SEM structural relationship analysis revealed that source of internet-based medical knowledge (P<.05) and justification for internet-based knowing in medicine (P<.05) were correlated with intention to use EBM databases. However, certainty and simplicity of internet-based medical knowledge were not. In addition, the gender (P<.05), years of working experience (P<.05), and academic degree (P<.01) were associated with intention to use online evidence-based medical databases for clinical practice.

Conclusions:

Advancing healthcare professionals’ internet-specific epistemic beliefs in medicine regarding source and justification may encourage them to retrieve valid medical information through EBM databases. Moreover, giving concern and support for specific healthcare professionals (i.e., female, senior, without graduate academic degree) may promote their intention to use certain databases for clinical practice.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Chiu YL, Lee YC, Tsai CC

Internet-Specific Epistemic Beliefs in Medicine and Intention to Use Evidence-Based Online Medical Databases Among Health Care Professionals: Cross-sectional Survey

J Med Internet Res 2021;23(3):e20030

DOI: 10.2196/20030

PMID: 33734092

PMCID: 8074852

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.