Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: May 7, 2020
Date Accepted: Mar 22, 2021

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Comparative Effectiveness of Enhanced Patient Instructions for Bowel Preparation Before Colonoscopy: Network Meta-analysis of 23 Randomized Controlled Trials

Tian X, Chen H, Yi LJ, Liu XL, Chen WQ, Jiménez-Herrera MF

Comparative Effectiveness of Enhanced Patient Instructions for Bowel Preparation Before Colonoscopy: Network Meta-analysis of 23 Randomized Controlled Trials

J Med Internet Res 2021;23(10):e19915

DOI: 10.2196/19915

PMID: 34694227

PMCID: 8576559

Comparative effectiveness of enhanced patient instructions for bowel preparation before colonoscopy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

  • Xu Tian; 
  • Hui Chen; 
  • Li-Juan Yi; 
  • Xiao-Ling Liu; 
  • Wei-Qing Chen; 
  • Maria F Jiménez-Herrera

ABSTRACT

Background:

Various enhanced patient instructions (EPIs) have been used for bowel preparation (BP) and our previous meta-analysis also demonstrated the efficacy of EPI in increasing colonic polyp and adenoma detection rate, however the optimal method for adequate BP is not yet clear.

Objective:

We performed a network meta-analysis to determine optimal instruction.

Methods:

We searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the effectiveness of EPIs with each other or standard patient instruction (SPI) for BP. We performed direct and Bayesian network meta-analysis for all instructions, and used Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation criteria (GRADE) to appraise the quality of evidence.

Results:

We included 23 RCTs (7969 patients) comparing 10 different instructions. In direct meta-analyses, most of EPIs, but not visual aid or mobile app, increase adequate preparation rate (APR). Network meta-analyses showed that additional explanation was superior to visual aid (odds ratio [OR], 0.35; 95%credible interval [Crl], 0.19 to 0.59), phone call (OR, 0.62; 95%Crl, 0.37 to 0.99), educational video (OR, 0.79; 95%Crl, 0.50 to 0.77), or mobile app (OR, 0.33; 95%Crl, 0.14 to 0.68), with low to high quality evidence; and newly designed booklet (OR, 3.28; 95%Crl, 1.59 to 6.16), short message service (SMS) (OR, 2.33; 95%Crl, 1.28 to 3.91), phone call (OR, 1.86; 95%Crl, 1.03 to 1.78), educational video (OR, 2.33; 95%Crl, 1.40 to 3.65), or social media app (OR, 2.42; 95%Crl, 1.40 to 3.93) was superior to visual aid or mobile app, with low to high quality evidence. SMS, phone call or social media app increases adherence to regime and satisfaction with BP. Social media app reduces risk of adverse events. Phone call or social media app increases the polyp detection rate.

Conclusions:

Newly designed booklet, phone call, educational video, or social media app can improve the quality of BP. Phone call or social media app improves adherence to BP regime and satisfaction with BP, reduce the risk of adverse events, or increases polyp detection rate.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Tian X, Chen H, Yi LJ, Liu XL, Chen WQ, Jiménez-Herrera MF

Comparative Effectiveness of Enhanced Patient Instructions for Bowel Preparation Before Colonoscopy: Network Meta-analysis of 23 Randomized Controlled Trials

J Med Internet Res 2021;23(10):e19915

DOI: 10.2196/19915

PMID: 34694227

PMCID: 8576559

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.