Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Public Health and Surveillance

Date Submitted: May 5, 2020
Date Accepted: Jul 14, 2020

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Practical and Ethical Concerns in Implementing Enhanced Surveillance Methods to Improve Continuity of HIV Care: Qualitative Expert Stakeholder Study

Buchbinder M, Colleen B, Rennie S, Juengst E, Brinkley-Rubinstein L, Rosen DL

Practical and Ethical Concerns in Implementing Enhanced Surveillance Methods to Improve Continuity of HIV Care: Qualitative Expert Stakeholder Study

JMIR Public Health Surveill 2020;6(3):e19891

DOI: 10.2196/19891

PMID: 32886069

PMCID: 7501574

Practical and ethical concerns in implementing enhanced surveillance methods to improve continuity of HIV care: a qualitative expert stakeholder study

  • Mara Buchbinder; 
  • Blue Colleen; 
  • Stuart Rennie; 
  • Eric Juengst; 
  • Lauren Brinkley-Rubinstein; 
  • David L. Rosen

ABSTRACT

Background:

Retention in HIV care is critical to maintaining viral suppression and preventing further transmission, yet less than 40% of people living with HIV in the United States are engaged in care and virally suppressed. All states in the US have a funding mandate to implement Data-to-Care (D2C) programs, which use surveillance data (e.g. laboratory, Medicaid billing) to identify out-of-care HIV-positive persons and re-link them to treatment.

Objective:

The purpose of this qualitative study was to identify and describe practical and ethical considerations that arise in planning for and implementing D2C.

Methods:

Forty-three expert stakeholders—including ethicists, privacy experts, researchers, public health personnel, HIV medical providers, legal experts, and community advocates—recruited via purposive sampling participated in audio-recorded semi-structured interviews to share their perspectives on D2C. Interview transcripts were analyzed across a priori and inductively derived thematic categories.

Results:

Stakeholders reported practical and ethical concerns in seven key domains: permission and consent, government assistances vs. overreach, privacy and confidentiality, stigma, HIV exceptionalism, criminalization, and data integrity and sharing. No patterns emerged in participant views based on stakeholder category.

Conclusions:

Participants expressed a great deal of support for D2C, yet also stressed the role of public trust and transparency in addressing the practical and ethical concerns they identified.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Buchbinder M, Colleen B, Rennie S, Juengst E, Brinkley-Rubinstein L, Rosen DL

Practical and Ethical Concerns in Implementing Enhanced Surveillance Methods to Improve Continuity of HIV Care: Qualitative Expert Stakeholder Study

JMIR Public Health Surveill 2020;6(3):e19891

DOI: 10.2196/19891

PMID: 32886069

PMCID: 7501574

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.