Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Apr 30, 2020
Date Accepted: Aug 11, 2020
Date Submitted to PubMed: Oct 27, 2020

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

The Public’s Perception of the Severity and Global Impact at the Start of the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic: A Crowdsourcing-Based Cross-Sectional Analysis

Shauly O, Stone G, Gould D

The Public’s Perception of the Severity and Global Impact at the Start of the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic: A Crowdsourcing-Based Cross-Sectional Analysis

J Med Internet Res 2020;22(11):e19768

DOI: 10.2196/19768

PMID: 33108314

PMCID: 7695545

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Crowdsourcing the Public’s Perception of the Severity and Global Impact of the Novel SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic

  • Orr Shauly; 
  • Gregory Stone; 
  • Daniel Gould

ABSTRACT

Background:

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a rapidly developing threat to most people in the United States and abroad. The behaviors of the general public are important to understand, as they may have a tremendous impact on the course of this novel coronavirus pandemic.

Objective:

This study intends to assess the US population's perception and knowledge of the virus as a threat and the behaviors of the general population in response.

Methods:

A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted with random volunteers recruited through Amazon Mechanical Turk© (Seattle, WA), an internet crowd-sourcing service, on 3/24/2020.A total of 969 participants met inclusion criteria. It was found that the perceived severity of the COVID-19 pandemic significantly differed between age groups (P < 0.001) and men and women (P < 0.001). A majority of study participants were actively adhering to CDC guidelines.

Results:

A total of 969 participants met inclusion criteria. It was found that the perceived severity of the COVID-19 pandemic significantly differed between age groups (P < 0.001) and men and women (P < 0.001). A majority of study participants were actively adhering to CDC guidelines.

Conclusions:

Though many participants identify COVID-19 as a threat, many failed to place themselves appropriately in the correct categories with respect to risk. This may indicate a need for additional public education in appropriately defining the risk of this novel pandemic.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Shauly O, Stone G, Gould D

The Public’s Perception of the Severity and Global Impact at the Start of the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic: A Crowdsourcing-Based Cross-Sectional Analysis

J Med Internet Res 2020;22(11):e19768

DOI: 10.2196/19768

PMID: 33108314

PMCID: 7695545

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.