Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research
Date Submitted: Apr 29, 2020
Date Accepted: Jun 4, 2020
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Usage of an Unguided, Web-based Psychoeducational Program for Distress Self-Management Initiated within 3 Months of Breast Cancer Diagnosis
ABSTRACT
Background:
Background:
Unguided, web-based psychoeducational interventions are gaining interest in order to reach patients while reducing pressure on clinical resources. Little research has been published however on how patients with cancer use these interventions.
Objective:
Objectives: The objective of this analysis was to evaluate how women newly diagnosed with breast cancer used the unguided web-based, psychoeducational distress self-management program CaringGuidance™ After Breast Cancer Diagnosis while enrolled in a pilot feasibility study.
Methods:
Methods:
Women with stage 0 to II breast cancer diagnosed within the prior three months were recruited from clinics primarily in the Northeastern United States for participation in a 12-week pilot study of CaringGuidance™ plus usual care versus usual care alone. Usage prompts included sets of emails sent weekly for 12 weeks; standardized congratulatory emails after every two hours of program use, and explanatory emails for each cognitive-behavioral exercise. Individual user activity on the site was automatically tracked by an analytics system and recorded directly in the CaringGuidance™ database.
Results:
Results:
Complete usage data were available for 54 subjects. Ninety-eight percent of the intervention group logged into CaringGuidance™ independently at least once. Thirty-eight (70%) logged-in during all three months, 15 (28%) were intermittent users, and one (2%) was a non-user. Users (n = 53) averaged 15.6 (SD = 9.85) logins. Mean logins was greatest in Month 1 (M = 7.26; SD = 4.02) and declined in Months 2 (M = 4.32 (SD = 3.66)) and Month 3 (M = 4.02 (SD = 3.82). Eleven (21%) used CaringGuidance™ with both the frequency and activity level intended at study outset, nine (17%) exceeded intended frequency and activity (high-high users) and 10 (19%) were below expected usage on both login frequency and activity (low-low users). Low-low users and high-high users differed significantly (p ≤ .001) on the total number of views and unique views of all program components. Change in depressive-symptoms and the number of sessions (r = .351) and logins (r = .348) between study Month 1 and 2 were significantly correlated (p = .018, .019). Higher baseline distress was associated with more unique views of program resources (r = .281, p = .043). Change in intrusive/avoidant thoughts from baseline to Month 3 and the number of users’ unique exercise views were negatively correlated (r = -.319, p = .035) so that more unique exercise views, equated with greater decline in intrusive/avoidant thoughts from baseline to Month 3.
Conclusions:
Conclusions:
These findings favor the hypothesis that the key ingredient is not amount of program use, but the self-selected activity of each user within the program. More research is needed on the ideal ways to maintain use, and capture and define engagement and enactment of behaviors by people with cancer accessing unguided, self-management web-based programs. Clinical Trial: This feasibility pilot study, not involving drugs or devices, was not deemed eligible in 2013 for clinical trial registration by the university research administration.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.