Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research
Date Submitted: May 2, 2020
Date Accepted: Jan 17, 2021
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Measuring public reaction to media reports of violence against physicians in China
ABSTRACT
Background:
The serious violence against physicians (VAD) in China has aroused world concern. Moreover, the aggravation of VAD was attributed to online media reports.
Objective:
To figure out after reading the VAD reports covered by the media, what kind of attitudes trends do the readers show for the actions of both patients and physicians? Are these trends influenced by the introduction and direction of national policies?
Methods:
We searched the Chinese VAD reports in international media sources from 2011-2016. We then tracked back the original reports and web-crawled the comments in China. After sampling and coding, we conducted a time series trend analysis.
Results:
Bootstrap shows the relationship between public sentiment of VAD reports and government’s interventions is significant. The interaction between year and attitude is significant. It was significant only between year 2013 and year 2014. The main VAD policies were enacted in 2013 and 2014. In 2011 and 2012, the proportion of "blame doctor" and "support doctor" was relatively balanced. However, in 2013, the proportions began to shift: the proportion of "blame doctor" rose while "support doctor" dropped.
Conclusions:
The state's administrative intervention effectively guided the public opinion. When government pays attention to the impact of the network on society, broken window effect was controlled that cyber-violence towards medical staff could decrease.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.