Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research
Date Submitted: May 2, 2020
Date Accepted: Jan 17, 2021
Measuring Public Reaction to Violence against Physicians in China: An Interrupted Time Series Analysis of Media Reports
ABSTRACT
Background:
Violence against physicians (VAD) in China is a serious problem that has attracted attention from both domestic and international media.
Objective:
This study investigates readers’ responses to media reports on VAD to identify attitudes toward perpetrators and physicians and examine if such trends are influenced by national policies.
Methods:
We searched 17 Chinese VAD reports in international media sources from 2011–2020. We then tracked back the original reports and web-crawled the 19,220 comments in China. To ascertain the possible turning point of public opinion, we searched VAD-related policies from Tsinghua University ipolicy database from 2011–2020, and found 19 policies enacted by the Chinese central government aimed at alleviating the intense patient-physician relationship. We then conducted a series of interrupted time series analyses to examine the influence of these policies on public sentiment toward VAD over time.
Results:
The interrupted time series analysis (ITSA) showed that the change in public sentiment toward VAD reports was temporally associated with government interventions. The declarations of ten of the public policies were followed by increases in the proportion of online public opinion in support of doctors (average slope changes of 0.010, P < .05). A decline in the proportion of online public opinion that blamed doctors (average level change of -0.784, P < .05) followed the declaration of three policies.
Conclusions:
The government’s administrative interventions effectively shaped public opinion but only temporarily. Continued public policy interventions are needed to sustain the reduction of hostility toward medical doctors.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.