Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Apr 24, 2020
Date Accepted: Jul 29, 2020

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Maximizing Telerehabilitation for Patients With Visual Loss After Stroke: Interview and Focus Group Study With Stroke Survivors, Carers, and Occupational Therapists

Dunne S, Close H, Richards N, Ellison A, Lane AR

Maximizing Telerehabilitation for Patients With Visual Loss After Stroke: Interview and Focus Group Study With Stroke Survivors, Carers, and Occupational Therapists

J Med Internet Res 2020;22(10):e19604

DOI: 10.2196/19604

PMID: 33095179

PMCID: 7647809

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Seeing solutions after stroke: Maximising telerehabilitation following visual loss after stroke

  • Stephen Dunne; 
  • Helen Close; 
  • Nicola Richards; 
  • Amanda Ellison; 
  • Alison R Lane

ABSTRACT

Background:

Visual field defects are a common consequence of stroke, and entraining compensatory eye-movement strategies has been identified as the most promising rehabilitation option. There has been a move towards compensatory telerehabilitation options such as the Durham Reading and Exploration (DREX) training app which significantly improves visual exploration, reading, and self-reported quality of life.

Objective:

This study details an iterative process of liaising with stroke survivors, carers, and healthcare professionals to identify barriers and facilitators to using such tools, alongside elements of good practice in telerehebalitation, with a focus on how the DREX package can be maximised.

Methods:

Survey data from 75 stroke survivors informed 12 semi-structured engagement activities (seven focus groups and five interviews) with 32 stroke survivors, 10 carers, and 24 occupational therapists.

Results:

Thematic analysis identified key themes within the data. Themes identified problems associated with post-stroke healthcare from both patient and occupational therapists’ perspective that need to be addressed to improve uptake of this rehabilitation tool and telerehabilitation options generally. This included identifying what additional materials or assistance were required to boost the impact of training packages generally. The acute rehabilitation setting was an identified barrier, with perceptions of technology considered to be a barrier by some but a facilitator by others. In addition to which four key features of telerehabilitation were identified: additional materials, the importance of goal-setting, repetition, and feedback.

Conclusions:

The data was utilised to try and overcome some barriers to the DREX training and are further discussed in terms of considerations for e-therapies more generally moving forward.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Dunne S, Close H, Richards N, Ellison A, Lane AR

Maximizing Telerehabilitation for Patients With Visual Loss After Stroke: Interview and Focus Group Study With Stroke Survivors, Carers, and Occupational Therapists

J Med Internet Res 2020;22(10):e19604

DOI: 10.2196/19604

PMID: 33095179

PMCID: 7647809

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.