JMIR Publications

ABSTRACT

In many countries, companies provide primary care services based predominantly on offering video-consultations via smartphone. One example is Babylon GP at Hand, which offers video-consultations to NHS patients, 24 hours a day, and has grown very rapidly in London over the last two years. The development of this type of service has been controversial, particularly in the United Kingdom, but there has been very little formal published evaluation of these services in primary care settings in any country. This article outlines the main controversies about the use of video-consultation based primary care services and shows how they are informed by the limited evaluations which have been conducted, particularly the evaluation of Babylon GP at Hand. The article outlines the potential advantages of video-consultation services in terms of convenience, speed of access, the ability to consult without travelling or face-to-face patient-doctor contact, and the possibility of recruiting doctors who cannot work in conventional settings or do not live near the patients. It also highlights the concerns and uncertainties about quality and safety, demand, fragmentation of care, the impact on other health services, efficiency, and equity. There are questions about whether primary care services based on video-consultations have a sustainable business model and whether they will undermine other health care providers. During the recent Covid-19 pandemic the use of video-consulting has become widespread, and this is likely to have lasting consequences for the future delivery of primary care. It is important to consider the advantages and disadvantages of these developments and undertake further evaluation before video-consultation based services in primary care become more widely established.