Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Cancer

Date Submitted: Apr 15, 2020
Date Accepted: Jan 25, 2022

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Comparing Survivors of Cancer in Population-Based Samples With Those in Online Cancer Communities: Cross-sectional Questionnaire Study

van Eenbergen MC, Vromans RD, Tick LW, Vreugdenhil G, Krahmer EJ, Mols F, Van De Poll-Franse LV

Comparing Survivors of Cancer in Population-Based Samples With Those in Online Cancer Communities: Cross-sectional Questionnaire Study

JMIR Cancer 2022;8(1):e19379

DOI: 10.2196/19379

PMID: 35258460

PMCID: 8941444

Comparing cancer survivors in population-based samples with those in online cancer communities: Identifying differences in internet use and information needs

  • Mies C. van Eenbergen; 
  • Ruben D. Vromans; 
  • Lidwine W. Tick; 
  • Gerard Vreugdenhil; 
  • Emiel J. Krahmer; 
  • Floortje Mols; 
  • Lonneke V. Van De Poll-Franse

ABSTRACT

Background:

see Objective

Objective:

Given the major internet use for health communication, the objective of this study was to determine the differences and similarities between survivors in population-based samples (POP) with survivors participating in online cancer communities (OCC) in how they use the internet in relation to their illness.

Methods:

We drew in 2017 a sample of 539 POP-patients and 531 OCC-patients. The POP-patients were sent a paper-based questionnaire and the OCC-patients the same questionnaire online. In the questionnaire we asked about demographics and four functions of internet use: content, communication, community and e-health.

Results:

The response of POP-internet users was 45% and the OCC-group 40%. The OCC-group had a significant higher education level (P<.001), were younger (P<.001) and more often employed (P<.001), attached greater importance to internet (80% vs. 54%, P< .001) and fellow patients (50% vs. 26%, P< .001). The OCC-group reported also significantly higher on knowledge of condition and treatment, and significantly lower on being able to manage physical impact, social impact and healthy lifestyle.

Conclusions:

We conclude that patients who actively participate in an online cancer community are not representative of patients with cancer in general. There are significant differences in personal characteristics, in internet use during their treatment journey, in sense of control over their illness and in participation wishes. Patients and health care professionals should actively refer to internet for information, that supports shared decision-making. Later in the journey, an online community provides patients with a platform for active participation in their treatment. For research it is important to take into account the bias in OCC-groups.


 Citation

Please cite as:

van Eenbergen MC, Vromans RD, Tick LW, Vreugdenhil G, Krahmer EJ, Mols F, Van De Poll-Franse LV

Comparing Survivors of Cancer in Population-Based Samples With Those in Online Cancer Communities: Cross-sectional Questionnaire Study

JMIR Cancer 2022;8(1):e19379

DOI: 10.2196/19379

PMID: 35258460

PMCID: 8941444

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.