Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research
Date Submitted: Apr 9, 2020
Date Accepted: Aug 2, 2021
Remote consultations versus standard face-to-face appointments for liver transplant patients in routine hospital care: a feasibility randomized controlled trial of myVideoClinic
ABSTRACT
Background:
Technological intervention to improve patient care is becoming more prominent and in 2017 the United Kingdom (UK) government set a target to offer digital services, including electronic consultations, to 95% of general practice patients. The majority of studies focusing on remote consultations to date have evaluated telephone appointments. Although some studies have used video conferencing technology in the secondary care sector, the sample sizes have been small and they differ in their findings.
Objective:
This study evaluated the feasibility of implementing video clinics at a large hospital in the UK and assessed whether patient satisfaction changed.
Methods:
Clinically stable liver transplant patients were randomised to video clinic appointments (intervention) or standard face-to-face appointments (usual care). The intervention group had routine follow-up appointments via secure video link. Participants were asked to complete post-appointment questionnaires over 12 months. The primary outcome was the difference in scores between baseline and study end by patient group for three domains of patient satisfaction using the Visit-Specific Satisfaction Instrument (VSQ-9). An embedded qualitative process evaluation used interviews to assess patient and staff experiences.
Results:
Fifty four patients were randomised: 29 to receive video clinics and 25 to usual care (recruitment rate 26.6%). Crossover from intervention to usual care was high (44.8%). 129 appointments were completed with 64% of questionnaires returned. Patient satisfaction (intention-to-treat analysis) increased in both intervention and usual care groups but the between-group difference was not significant after controlling for baseline scores. Video appointments were perceived to save patients time and money, and patients found video clinics to be less burdensome, with fewer negative impacts on their health. Technical problems with the software were common, however, the software is constantly evolving and as time goes on these types of problems should ease. Both clinicians and patients saw video clinic appointments as positive and beneficial
Conclusions:
The UK National Health Service is facing huge challenges with regards to staffing, budgets and space due to increasing patient numbers. Being innovative by using available technology to offer routine follow-up appointments via secure video link may help ease some of the burdens and free up clinic space for those patients who need to be seen face-to-face. There has recently been a rapid increase in the number of health and social care organisations offering remote consultations in order to minimise the spread of disease following the outbreak of COVID-19. This study outlines our experiences of using a remote video consultation system and the associated advantages and pitfalls. Clinical Trial: ISRCTN number: 14093266 (retrospectively registered)
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.