Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Apr 7, 2020
Date Accepted: Mar 14, 2021

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Web-Based Smartphone Algorithm for Calculating Blood Pressure From Photoplethysmography Remotely in a General Adult Population: Validation Study

Holyoke P, Yogaratnam K, Kalles E

Web-Based Smartphone Algorithm for Calculating Blood Pressure From Photoplethysmography Remotely in a General Adult Population: Validation Study

J Med Internet Res 2021;23(4):e19187

DOI: 10.2196/19187

PMID: 33890856

PMCID: 8105754

A Web-based, Smartphone-enabled Algorithm for Calculating Blood Pressure Remotely using Photoplethysmogram (PPG) Waveforms for the General Adult Population: Observational Study

  • Paul Holyoke; 
  • Karthika Yogaratnam; 
  • Elizabeth Kalles

ABSTRACT

Background:

The current gold standard instrument for measuring blood pressure is a mercury-filled sphygmomanometer with a cuff and stethoscope. However, this is not convenient or feasible for remote monitoring and virtual care. HeartBeat Technologies Ltd. developed a novel approach to measuring blood pressure remotely after an initial blood pressure reading using the conventional measurement method. Using a finger pulse oximeter, a photoplethysmogram wave (PPG) is transmitted by Bluetooth to a smartphone or tablet. An application called MediBeat on the smartphone transmits the PPG to a server where a proprietary algorithm analyzes it to calculate the person’s current blood pressure level and sends the level back to the smartphone and the device of the individual’s healthcare provider.

Objective:

This study sought to determine whether the HeartBeat algorithm calculates blood pressure as accurately as required by the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010 (ESH-IP2) for validation of blood pressure measuring devices.

Methods:

The ESH-IP2, modified to conform to a more recent international consensus statement, was followed. The ESH-IP2 establishes strict guidelines for the conduct and reporting of any validation of any device to measure blood pressure, including using the gold standard manual blood pressure instrument as a comparator and specific required accuracy levels for low, medium and high ranges of blood pressure readings. The consensus statement requires a greater number of study participants for each of the blood pressure ranges. The validation of the accuracy of the algorithm was conducted in conjunction with a Contec CMS50EW pulse oximeter and a Samsung Galaxy XCover 4 smartphone.

Results:

The differences between the HeartBeat-calculated and the manually-measured blood pressures did not meet the ESH-IP2 standards for accuracy for either systolic or diastolic blood pressure measurements. There was no discernible pattern in the inaccuracies in the HeartBeat-calculated measures.

Conclusions:

The current version of the HeartBeat algorithm, implemented in combination with the MediBeat application, the specific pulse oximeter and the Android smartphones, is not accurate for use in the general population. Clinical Trial: This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT04082819).


 Citation

Please cite as:

Holyoke P, Yogaratnam K, Kalles E

Web-Based Smartphone Algorithm for Calculating Blood Pressure From Photoplethysmography Remotely in a General Adult Population: Validation Study

J Med Internet Res 2021;23(4):e19187

DOI: 10.2196/19187

PMID: 33890856

PMCID: 8105754

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.