Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.
Who will be affected?
Readers: No access to all 28 journals. We recommend accessing our articles via PubMed Central
Authors: No access to the submission form or your user account.
Reviewers: No access to your user account. Please download manuscripts you are reviewing for offline reading before Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 7:00 PM.
Editors: No access to your user account to assign reviewers or make decisions.
Copyeditors: No access to user account. Please download manuscripts you are copyediting before Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 7:00 PM.
Comparison of rapid serological and SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR assays performed simultaneously in symptomatic COVID-19 patients
Angelo Virgilio Paradiso;
Simona De Summa;
Daniela Loconsole;
Vito Procacci;
Anna Sallustio;
Francesca Centrone;
Nicola Silvestris;
Vito Cafagna;
Giuseppe De Palma;
Antonio Tufaro;
Vito Michele Garrisi;
Maria Chironna
ABSTRACT
Background:
RT-PCR test for identifiction of viral nucleic acid is the current standard diagnostic method for the diagnosis of COVID-19 disease but technical reasons limit the utilization of this assay on large scale screenings.
Objective:
The aim of the present study is to investigate the differences and their clinical meanings of RT-PCR and rapid serological test.
Methods:
We verified in a consecutive series of 191 symptomatic patients the clinical information that new rapid serological colorimetric test qualitatively analyzing IgM/IgG expression can provide with respect to standard assay and with respect to clinical outcome of patients.
Results:
Rapid serological test showed a sensitivity of 30% and a specificity of 89% with respect to the standard assay but, interestingly, these performances improve after 8 days of symptoms appearance. After 10 days of symptoms the predictive value of rapid serological test is higher than that of standard assay. When the behaviour of the two immunoglobulins was evaluated with respect to time length of symptoms appearance, no significant difference in immunoglobulins behaviour was shown.
Conclusions:
The rapid serological test analyzed in the present study is candidate to provide information on immunoreaction of the subject to COVID-19 exposure.
Citation
Please cite as:
Paradiso AV, De Summa S, Loconsole D, Procacci V, Sallustio A, Centrone F, Silvestris N, Cafagna V, De Palma G, Tufaro A, Garrisi VM, Chironna M
Rapid Serological Assays and SARS-CoV-2 Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction Assays for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2: Comparative Study