Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Serious Games

Date Submitted: Apr 3, 2020
Date Accepted: May 29, 2020

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Quality Criteria for Serious Games: Serious Part, Game Part, and Balance

Caserman P, Hoffmann K, Müller P, Schaub M, Straßburg K, Wiemeyer J, Bruder R, Göbel S

Quality Criteria for Serious Games: Serious Part, Game Part, and Balance

JMIR Serious Games 2020;8(3):e19037

DOI: 10.2196/19037

PMID: 32706669

PMCID: 7414398

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Quality Criteria for Serious Games: Serious Part, Game Part, and Balance

  • Polona Caserman; 
  • Katrin Hoffmann; 
  • Philipp Müller; 
  • Marcel Schaub; 
  • Katharina Straßburg; 
  • Josef Wiemeyer; 
  • Regina Bruder; 
  • Stefan Göbel

ABSTRACT

Serious games are digital games that have an additional goal beyond entertainment. Recently, many studies explored different quality criteria for serious games, including effectiveness and attractiveness. Unfortunately, the double mission of serious games, i.e., simultaneous achievement of intended effects (“serious” part) and entertainment (“game” part), is not adequately considered in these studies. This paper aims to identify essential quality criteria for good serious games. The fundamental goal of our research is to identify important factors of serious games and to adapt the existing principles and requirements from game-related literature to suit the idea of effective and attractive serious games. In addition to the review of the relevant literature, we also include workshop results. Furthermore, we analyzed and summarized 19 state of the art serious games for education and health. We include successful and well-known games that fulfill “serious” and “game” characteristics. The selected serious games either prove their effectiveness through scientific studies or by winning game awards. For the analysis of these games, we refer to the DIN SPEC 91380 Serious Games Metadata Format. A summarized text states important quality criteria for the “serious” as well as the “game” part and especially the balance between them. We provide guidelines for high-quality serious games drawn from literature analysis and in close cooperation with domain experts based on the proven Metadata Format.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Caserman P, Hoffmann K, Müller P, Schaub M, Straßburg K, Wiemeyer J, Bruder R, Göbel S

Quality Criteria for Serious Games: Serious Part, Game Part, and Balance

JMIR Serious Games 2020;8(3):e19037

DOI: 10.2196/19037

PMID: 32706669

PMCID: 7414398

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.